The long weekend

Date: Sun, 14 Feb 1999 22:13:30 -0400 (AST)
From: "Andrew D. Wright" <au141@chebucto.ns.ca>
To: Christopher Majka <nextug@is.dal.ca>
cc: < @chebucto.ns.ca>, CCN Board <ccn-board@chebucto.ns.ca>, CCN Userhelp <userhelp@chebucto.ns.ca>,
Precedence: bulk
Return-Path: <ccn-ip-mml-owner@chebucto.ns.ca>

next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects

Index of Subjects

	Re: Peter Morgan's suggestion, this debate moving to ccn-comm.

					Andrew


On Sun, 14 Feb 1999, Christopher Majka wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> On Sun, 14 Feb 1999,   wrote:
> 
> > > 	I disagree. As I said, the majority of our users are on Windows
> > > systems. There is no Y2K compliant version of Windows. This qualifies as
> > > urgent news. We have a one-stop page of Windows fixes up. No one else
> > > does, not even Microsoft. We should be shouting this from the roof tops.
> > > It should be the easiest thing to find.
> > 
> >    Y2K isn't CCN's concern when it comes to users.  We shouldn't be
> > holding their hands and we shouldn't be cluttering up our Homepage with
> > such a link.  We can put a link in the HelpDesk and mention in the MOTD
> > that if someone has a problem with Y2K, they can ask userhelp or find
> > the page at: given url.
> 
> I agree. At present the home page of the Chebucto Community Net is not the
> place to advertise Y2K. While there may be all sorts of things that are
> true of the demographics of CCN users (majority: male, anglo-saxon,
> Christian, certain age and income brackets, watch X-files, Globe & Mail
> readers, etc.) this doesn't mean we necessarily need to include links from
> the home page to Viagra, mutual funds, X-files, Globe & Mail, etc. at
> least with the current focus of what we are doing. The local community is
> our focus, particularly in terms of the home page.
> 
> This is not to say that we couldn't take another approach (like Sympatico,
> Netscape, Yahoo, etc.) and provide a very generalized set of links to all
> sorts of resources that could conceiveably be of interest to our
> readers/users. I doubt that we could at present support such an approach,
> at least not without the advertising and funding which underpin other such
> sites.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Chris
> 
> _._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._.
> Christopher Majka                               <aa051@chebucto.ns.ca>
> Editor-in-Chief: Chebucto Community Net - Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
> URL = http://www.chebucto.ns.ca/Home.html
> 
> "We have ... in this country ... far too many captive editors who cannot 
> even be heard to rattle their chains."              -- Carl E. Lindstrom
> _._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._.
> 
> 

next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects