REPORT: corrected aliases (I hope)

Date: Tue, 24 Jun 1997 18:21:49 -0300
From: Landon Boyd <landon@csuite.chebucto.ns.ca>
To: csuite-tech@chebucto.ns.ca
References: <19970624113338.23470@csuite.chebucto.ns.ca> <Pine.SOL.3.90.970624132651.18569A-100000@ug>
Precedence: bulk

next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects

Index of Subjects
On Tue, Jun 24, 1997 at 01:30:24PM -0300, James Fifield wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Jun 1997, Landon Boyd wrote:
> 
> > I hate to bring this up again, but don't forget about ther @@ABBREV@@@
> > variable.  We should be using it instead of @@@SHORT_NAME@@@ in such
> > things as mail aliases.
> > 
> > 
> > Landon
> > 
> 
> I discussed this shortly with David Trueman, and we feel that Ed's 
> comment about the VCN is still valid.  I don't know if the @@@ABBREV@@@
> is different  for a different VCN?  If it is, I'll reconsider changing
> things around in a post-beta-2.0 make clean up.

Right, I had forgotten about Ed's comment, but remember that we
aren't officially supporting VCNs in 1.0.  It just seems to me that
if we have the @@@ABBREV@@@ variable, then we should use it.  If
we decide that it's not useful, we should get rid of it alltogether.


Landon

==================================================================
Landon Boyd                          landon@chebucto.ns.ca
Computer Science Co-op,              http://chebucto.ns.ca/~landon
Dalhousie University                 902-455-4099(hm)
==================================================================


next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects