[NatureNS] Birds, Dolphins, etc

From: David & Alison Webster <dwebster@glinx.com>
To: naturens@chebucto.ns.ca
References: <AANLkTil6K7tatkJPCxBIpwehCTWx7_1s0DiGyYuyYTh2@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 14:56:15 -0300
Precedence: bulk
Return-Path: <naturens-mml-owner@chebucto.ns.ca>
Original-Recipient: rfc822;"| (cd /csuite/info/Environment/FNSN/MList; /csuite/lib/arch2html)"

next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects

Index of Subjects
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

--Boundary_(ID_56Sx4TjrWJKjB9duFLA5tA)
Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT

Hi Suzanne & All,                May 25, 2010
    Working at 1.5 km with complications of murky water and methane ice don't make it easy but I get the impression that the engineers involved either lack both imagination and know-how or they have been told (quietly) to not try too hard; from a BP standpoint, compensation to the few who get past the lawyers may cost less than containment.  

    This may be incorrect, but dispersing the oil with wetting agents would (to me) logically increase toxicity by increasing the water/oil contact surface. So I wonder. Does use of dispersants mean that toxicity is not increased or does it mean that the problem (as viewed superficially) seems to be lessened ?

    This event may stall or slow deep oil activity.

Yt, Dave Webster, Kentville
    
    
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Suzanne Townsend 
  To: naturens@chebucto.ns.ca 
  Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2010 10:19 AM
  Subject: [NatureNS] Birds, Dolphins, etc


  Is anyone getting mad enough yet to march on Washington, London, and BP to get off the red tape and go suck up the mess? I don't even see anything about it in the paper today. It's like it's not important enough? 

  http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=over-300-dead-birds-are-likely






------------------------------------------------------------------------------



  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
  Version: 9.0.819 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2895 - Release Date: 05/25/10 03:26:00

--Boundary_(ID_56Sx4TjrWJKjB9duFLA5tA)
Content-type: text/html; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 8.00.6001.18904">
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=1>Hi Suzanne &amp; All,&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; May 25, 2010</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=1>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Working at 1.5 km with complications of 
murky water and methane ice don't make it easy but I get the impression that the 
engineers involved either&nbsp;lack both&nbsp;imagination&nbsp;and know-how or 
they have been told (quietly)&nbsp;to not try too hard; from a BP standpoint, 
compensation to the few who get past the lawyers may cost less than 
containment.&nbsp; </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=1></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=1>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; This may be incorrect, but dispersing the 
oil with wetting agents would (to me) logically increase toxicity by increasing 
the water/oil contact surface. So I wonder. Does use of dispersants mean that 
toxicity is not increased or does it mean that the problem (as viewed 
superficially) seems to be lessened ?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=1></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=1>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; This event may stall or slow&nbsp;deep oil 
activity.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=1></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=1>Yt, Dave Webster, Kentville</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=1>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=1>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE 
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
  <DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
  <DIV 
  style="FONT: 10pt arial; BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; font-color: black"><B>From:</B> 
  <A title=suzanne.townsend@gmail.com 
  href="mailto:suzanne.townsend@gmail.com">Suzanne Townsend</A> </DIV>
  <DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=naturens@chebucto.ns.ca 
  href="mailto:naturens@chebucto.ns.ca">naturens@chebucto.ns.ca</A> </DIV>
  <DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Tuesday, May 25, 2010 10:19 
AM</DIV>
  <DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> [NatureNS] Birds, Dolphins, 
  etc</DIV>
  <DIV><BR></DIV>
  <DIV>Is anyone getting mad enough yet to march on Washington, London, and BP 
  to get off the red tape and go suck up the mess? I don't even see anything 
  about it in the paper today. It's like it's not important enough? </DIV>
  <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV><A 
  href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=over-300-dead-birds-are-likely">http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=over-300-dead-birds-are-likely</A></DIV>
  <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <P>
  <HR>

  <P></P><BR>No virus found in this incoming message.<BR>Checked by AVG - 
  www.avg.com <BR>Version: 9.0.819 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2895 - Release 
  Date: 05/25/10 03:26:00<BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>

--Boundary_(ID_56Sx4TjrWJKjB9duFLA5tA)--

next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects