next message in archive
no next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects
Index of Subjects Laviolette, Lance (EXP) wrote: >David Webster wrote: > >>On a related note, I walked past the pond that is in the >>Halifax Public Gardens recently and noticed that it was green >>and almost opaque with microscopic algal growth. I didn't >>notice any agricultural activities nearby. >> Hi Lance, Joanne & All, Aug 4, 2008 You are on the right track, in that my comments were with reference to the now frequent foul denigration of agriculture as the sole source of water pollution. The combined effect of lawns, ornamentals, sewage, transportation and industrial venting may, I suspect, render agricultural pollution tiny by comparison but I am aware of no surveys other than opinion polls [e.g. Do you think agriculture is a good thing, bad thing or worse thing for the environment ?]. So if the Garden's ducks constitute a public agricultural crop then, if I understand correctly, it will be OK for me as a member of the public to harvest a few next time. Yt, DW > >David, > >That would depend on whether one could classify the public feeding of >ducks and gulls and their (the ducks and gulls not the public) >subsequent defecation as 'an agricultural activity' wouldn't it? The >'growing of poultry' seems to fit the 'bill' in this case. > >All the best, > >Lance >
next message in archive
no next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects