[NatureNS] Forthcoming Buddhism and Physics public talk at King's

References: <f1b6fe9722e0ce0ab2a42dc0a8c8618f@dal.ca> <47D08B68.5080905@glinx.com>
From: Kent Mullin <kmullin@ns.sympatico.ca>
Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2008 15:50:07 -0300
To: naturens@chebucto.ns.ca
Precedence: bulk
Return-Path: <naturens-mml-owner@chebucto.ns.ca>
Original-Recipient: rfc822;"| (cd /csuite/info/Environment/FNSN/MList; /csuite/lib/arch2html)"

next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects

Index of Subjects
Hi All,

Well said David, my sentiments exactly. It is commonly accepted that  
one can prove anything with statistics, but I often wonder if the  
same isn't true of quantum mechanics as well.

K.


On 6-Mar-08, at 8:25 PM, David & Alison Webster wrote:

> Hi All,            Mar 6, 2008
>    I am wondering if this talk was initially scheduled for Apr 1.
>
>    And, if I follow this correctly, tides are caused by too many  
> people looking at the conditional moon that otherwise would be  
> absent and therefore unable to exert a gravitational force. And the  
> Bay of Fundy, with record tidal range, is I suppose the epicenter  
> of Moonstruckosity.
>
>    And this explains the Buddist Hmm-mmmmmmm.
>
>    But, all things considered, it is a relief to know that all  
> those things which I don't see (such as hyperbolic functions),  
> don't exist after all.
> Yt, DW, Kentville

next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects