[NatureNS] Determining Elevation

From: "john belbin" <jbelbin@ns.sympatico.ca>
To: "Naturens" <naturens@chebucto.ns.ca>
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 20:07:23 -0400
Importance: Normal
Precedence: bulk
Return-Path: <naturens-mml-owner@chebucto.ns.ca>
Original-Recipient: rfc822;"| (cd /csuite/info/Environment/FNSN/MList; /csuite/lib/arch2html)"

next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects

article, a change of 1 mm&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV style=3D"marg
There has been quite a bit of discussion about whether Nova Scotia is either
sinking or rebounding  relative to the our somewhat mythical "sea level".
The answer of course is yes!

Sea level has been rising world wide over the last 20,000 years, this has
nothing to do with the efforts or sins of mankind, but the really sobering
thought is that man induced changes are only making it worse and apparently
changing the rate of that increase. Locally in the Bay of Fundy, the height
of the sea relative to the land had been rising steadily by almost 40
centimetres every century, that may well be now increasing.

Isostatic changes caused by the removal of the huge weight of the glacial
ice has also had a major effect in this region. The ice was apparently
thickest in the region between the New Brunswick shore and the Digby Neck
area, the land here being depressed some 140 metres. The sea level at the
time was about 100 metres lower than at present - this accounts for the
raised beaches at about 40 metres elevation found along Digby Neck.

This rebound now being largely over, most of Nova Scotia is currently
sinking. Geodetic levelling has shown that the Truro region has subsided
about 30 Centimetres and the rest of the region by about 20 centimetres. You
can see that effect in the submerged forests near Grand Pre, Yarmouth and
elsewhere. As the sea level has been increasing by about 10 cm per century,
the remainder of the change is due to subsidence. Another sobering
consideration is the fact that the famed Bay of Fundy tides were absolutely
normal when all the deepening of the local water began after the last ice
age.  Magnification of the tides caused by the shape of the Bay, has itself
increased over the years. I have no knowledge about whether the tidal
enhancement process has reached its peak but that would seem unlikely, so a
small increase in relative sea level could cause a larger increase in our
already inflated tides. Yet more changes to deal with! Deeper water brings
stronger waves closer to the coast and more storm damage. Parts of the Minas
Basin are already eroding by about 1 metre per year - hence all the silt in
the water. You can reasonably expect that to get worse.

The notion of sea level is a locally determined convenient point from which
to measure other things, such as depths, heights, relative elevations and
the form of the terrain. It is found by measuring the rise and fall of the
ocean at tide gauge stations over a period of 19 years and averaging the
fluctuations recorded. It is an average figure, there is nothing absolute
about it and it will vary from place to place with the shape of the Earth.
It is constantly fluctuating and considerably varied. Sea level in Maine is
38 mm higher than in Florida. If you want to use a GPS for elevations you
have to take and adjust for local variations otherwise your figures will not
bear much resemblance to reality.  When our maps say things like "elevations
are based on mean sea level" we are not all using the same standard, merely
a convenient approximation. Sea level has now been shown to contain hills
and valleys, smaller but similar to those found on land, due to
gravitational variations and other factors. Some advanced radar satellites
now use the "bumpy" surface of the sea to tell us the shape of the ocean
bottom hidden far below in a manner we have never seen before.

Hopefully this is a little clearer than Fundy mud!


next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects