next message in archive
no next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects
Index of Subjects Hi David, I hadn't taken offense, I was indicating that I wasn't defending my own work, so there isn't a personal stake in it. I agree with most of your response, but you still have the problem that rightly or wrongly many legitimate environmentalists (including some who called the WWF position shots) either accept that things like Sable are going to happen and strive, to the best of their ability and strategic know how, to minimize impacts, or believe that Sable is a better alternative to other option (eg coal?), and again strive to minimize impacts. Most of us (environmentalists) also contribute to the need for such projects by continuing to use resources at a greater than sustainable level (even if we are lower than most other 'northerners'). In this I agree with your integrated approach, but its far beyond fighting issues, it's changing approaches... changing society. Colin PS thanks for the compliments!
next message in archive
no next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects