(No Subject)

streamlined, not fattened to hopefully cover every possibility.

next message in archive
no next message in thread
previous message in archive
Index of Subjects



Bob Adams
IP Training
464-9258


"David L. Potter" wrote:
> 
> Thanks everyone for the speedy responses! Obviously there's a significant
> ammount of interest in the subject.
> 
> In addition to the replies that have gone to the lists I've received one
> reply from an IP editor who is personally a very strong supporter of RCS.
> 
> ---
> 
> In the past we've always tried to give users an opportunity to retain a
> old familiar way of doing things while introducing new services. Clearly
> IP's who have never used the old editing systems are more likely to have
> a problem if they 'bump' into RCS files, locks, etc...
> 
> However if we are going to allow individuals a choice we need a
> relatively foolproof way of ensuring that RCS does not creep into
> directories where RCS is clearly not wanted.
> 
> This has me thnking about using a .no_rcs file type mechanism. and/or a
> nightly 'clean out the RCS for registered directories' script or some
> such mechanism... there's a couple of ways of doing it...
> 
> I'm out of town for a couple of days and although I'll be checking email
> I won't be quite as accessible for about 10 days.
> 
> david potter

next message in archive
no next message in thread
previous message in archive
Index of Subjects