(No Subject)

From: editors-owner@chebucto.ns.ca
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Date: Wed, 31 May 2000 13:29:02 -0300
Return-Path: <editors-mml-owner@chebucto.ns.ca>

next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects

Index of Subjects
id <S37985AbQEaEQR>; Wed, 31 May 2000 01:16:17 -0300
Date:	Wed, 31 May 2000 01:16:17 -0300 (ADT)
From:	"Andrew D. Wright" <adw@chebucto.ns.ca>
To:	Michael Smith <michael@csuite.ns.ca>
cc:	CCN Tech <ccn-tech@chebucto.ns.ca>, editors@chebucto.ns.ca
Subject: Re: New Homepage...
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.20.0005310045310.1720-100000@pentagram.nslug.ns.ca>
Message-ID:
<Pine.GSO.3.95.iB1.0.1000531010602.6287A-100000@halifax.chebucto.ns.ca>
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Orcpt: rfc822;"|/csuite/etc/majordomo/wrapper resend -l editors -h
chebucto.ns.ca editors-mml"
Sender: editors-owner@chebucto.ns.ca
Precedence: bulk


On Wed, 31 May 2000, Michael Smith wrote:

> I'd like to avoid cutting off 3.0x browsers if we can. They should have no
> problem with the new homepage, and I think there are still a lot of them.


	The Microsoft implementation of 'JScript' that shipped with
MSIE 2 and 3 chokes hard when it hits this page. Netscape 3.04 gives a
JavaScript error, but if you click it away everything seems to work. I
agree that it would be nice to have mozilla 3 onboard, but can't see how.


> What does the webmail form need JavaScript? (It doesn't :)


	You said that before. It still seems to, though. Check:

http://www.chebucto.ns.ca/~awright/real/index2.htm
(with JavaScript)

and

http://www.chebucto.ns.ca/~awright/real/index3.htm
(no JavaScript).


next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects