next message in archive
no next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects
Index of Subjects > Also, you wrote: > >However, this discussion has been centered around keeping or > getting rid of > >the IPDB. And this is neither the question we should be asking, nor the > >paths we should be taking. > > We are not asking this question. The IPDB stays - that's a decision > made by the Board. The Tech team is now tasked with working out a > suitable modification + interface that jointly accesses both NameDB > and IPDB to provide the functionality that has been identified months > ago. If your not asking that question, why are you anwsering it? Why do you want the IPDB? Why do you not want the features that the IPDB provides? I dont understand the attachement to the IPDB. Attachements to the features I can see, however I have never seen conclusivly wha tthose fearures are. The list of features provided was what the office wanted. And we have a solution for that: put everting in the namedb.
next message in archive
no next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects