Process question

From: jwarnica@ns.sympatico.ca (Jeff Warnica)
To: "David L. Potter" <potter@chebucto.ns.ca>, "CCN Board of Directors" <ccn-board@chebucto.ns.ca>
Cc: "CCN Editors" <editors@chebucto.ns.ca>, "CCN Tech" <ccn-tech@chebucto.ns.ca>, "CCN Information Provider Committee" <ccn-ip@chebucto.ns.ca>
Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 12:57:00 -0300
Importance: Normal
Precedence: bulk
Return-Path: <ccn-ip-mml-owner@chebucto.ns.ca>

next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects

Index of Subjects

Then rebute them, dont continue to complain about a flawed process. 'there
all wrong' is meaningless.

Besides, most of the work is done: we have a system in place that handles
group administration, and there is a working prototype of the generated on
the fly index.

I have seen no efforts to make the heavy modifications necessary to the IPDB
system happen.

> The 'detailed' rebutals that has been offered to Chris Majka's
> observations
> are full of half-truths, ignorance about the existance/value of tools at
> hand, mistaken assumptions, and statements that appear designed to gloss
> over a serious break with the traditions of CCN. They further evidence a
> complete disregard for the experience of volunteers in these areas. To
> continue down this road is a sure opportunity for the board to see if the
> organizaiton can operate without volunteers.

next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects