next message in archive
no next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects
Index of Subjects Hi Andrew et al., I have no problem with this. We can be flexible at the CCN, however, potential IPs need to make at least some effort to understand and work within our structures. Moreover, David Potter has made a convincing case that CCN logins and listnames should not be as generic as 'church'. If you are to represent Fairview United Church the name should be at least somewhat indicative of the actual organization. Cheers, Chris On Mon, 26 Jul 1999, Andrew D. Wright wrote: > > I have received the below mentioned application - custom user ID > "church". Unless I hear a strong objection, I am going to mail this > application and the cheque back to the sender. > > I will be rejecting this on two grounds: > > First and foremost because we don't give out individual accounts to groups > and I and Chris Majka have both written multiple times at length to these > people telling them we don't do this. If the Fairview United Church wants > an email account, they can register and become an IP like every other > church and group on CCN has done. > > Second, I find their choice of name more than a little presumptuous, > particularly in light of the first reason. If they're > church@chebucto.ns.ca, what does that make all the other churches > on CCN? > > If no one has any strong objections, this will be in the mail by > end of business today. I will include a letter explaining (yet again) > reason one to them. > > Andrew > > > On Fri, 23 Jul 1999, Edwin Davidson wrote: > > > Dear Andrew: > > > > Today I mailed off a letter and photo ID of my wife Linda to CCN. This > > account is for the Fairview United Church. You have a $ 50.00 cheque from > > us already. > > > > Thank you. > > > > Edwin Davidson > > > > >
next message in archive
no next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects