IP Survey

Date: Thu, 18 Feb 1999 23:38:37 -0400 (AST)
From: < @chebucto.ns.ca>
To: Peter Mortimer <ag500@chebucto.ns.ca>
cc: CCN Board <ccn-board@chebucto.ns.ca>, ccn-ip@chebucto.ns.ca
Precedence: bulk
Return-Path: <ccn-ip-mml-owner@chebucto.ns.ca>

next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects

Index of Subjects

Hi Peter et al,

   I never received this survey.  Was it sent to:  all-ips@chebucto.ns.ca?
I wonder how many others didn't receive it either.

 

IP Editor for 7 CCN IP sites:
 - Nova Scotia Apple Users Group
 - Nova Scotia Atari Computer Users Group
 - Classic Computer Club
 - Commodore Users Group of Nova Scotia
 - Nova Scotia Tourette Syndrome Information Site
 - Entertainment Media Archives
 - Comics Media Archives


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------


On Thu, 18 Feb 1999, Peter Mortimer wrote:

> 
> Hello,
> 
> Problems with my home computer have resulted in the loss of several files
> related to the IP survey.  Rather than start everything all over again
> I've decided to make the "report" based on what I've been able to
> recover...
> 
> 14 IP editors responded from a mail out of 45 emails
> 
> 12 IP editors maintain only one site (some very large) 
> 1 IP editor maintains 2 sites
> 1 IP editor maintains 4 sites
> 
> 12 IP editors are CCN members
> 
> all 14 IP editors maintain their site(s) as a volunteer
> 
> 9 IP editors primarily access CCN through dial-up; telnet is the next most
> common (7)
> 
> 2 of the organizations have considered moving to a commercial ISP(reasons
> given: domain name;  organization is spread across 4 provinces, other
> ISP's can make access easier for other members to access and edit pages)
> 
> 10 IP editors use CCN as their personal ISP; 4 use another ISP as well
> 
> 13 IP editors said that they were happy with the level of service from CCN
> 
> some comments: provided by the IP editors:
> appreciate the speed of lynx; initial training was fine but there are
> still mysteries about CCN's structure and file management that elude me;
> like CCN as a community net but not for accessing the www; [I] mainyain
> CCN membership as support for the freenet concept and the service it
> provides the community and community groups.
> 
> suggested improvements: also provided by the IP editors
> graphical interface - but should be paid for by those that use it; like to
> see majordomo replaced with more modern listserver; ongoing IP training so
> that we can continue to improve sites.
> 
> 
> My editorial comment... based on this survey and general observations ...
> 
> In general:
> 
> IP editors have a loyalty to their own organization, but not necessarily
> to CCN.  The most common reasons for a group to use CCN as their ISP are:
> (1) low (or no) cost, and (2) the volunteer IP editor is already a CCN
> user.
> 
> It is unlikely that  that we will be able to recruit CCN volunteers from
> the IP editors .  My attempts to involve IP editors in the IP committee 
> have been totally unsuccessful.
> 
> 
>    ----
>    Peter Mortimer 
>    Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
> 
> 
> 

next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects