next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects
Quoting pce@accesswave.ca: > ... but of course someone (Fred Schueler) _did_ comment on this just > after I hit "return". Oh well. * there's a lag in NatureNS sending out the posts - I sent mine in before Peter's came to me,but before mine came back to me. Even e- can cross in the mail. fred. ============================================================== > > On 2015-12-24 12:35 PM, pce@accesswave.ca wrote: >> I don't think that anyone has commented on this directly, but >> removing "biomass" from the forest and burning it also removes >> nutrients from the forest, thus steadily empoverishing the soil. >> Green? Hah! >> >> Peter Payzant >> >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------ Frederick W. Schueler & Aleta Karstad Mudpuppy Night - http://pinicola.ca/mudpup1.htm Vulnerable Watersheds - http://vulnerablewaters.blogspot.ca/ study our books - http://pinicola.ca/books/index.htm RR#2 Bishops Mills, Ontario, Canada K0G 1T0 on the Smiths Falls Limestone Plain 44* 52'N 75* 42'W (613)258-3107 <bckcdb at istar.ca> http://pinicola.ca/ "[The] two fundamental steps of scientific thought - the conjecture and refutation of Popper - have little place in the usual conception of intelligence. If something is to be dismissed as inadequate, it is surely not Darwin [, whose] works manifest the activity of a mind seeking for wisdom, a value which conventional philosophy has largely abandoned." Ghiselen, 1969. Triumph of the Darwinian Method, p 237. ------------------------------------------------------------
next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects