next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects
Index of Subjects <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"><html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head> <meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type"/> </head><body style=""> <div> <span style="font-size: 12pt;">Not to worry John</span> </div> <div> <span style="font-size: 12pt;">Pay the local fellow in cash - the kind that folds!<br/></span> </div> <div> <span style="font-size: 12pt;">Don't argue about the wood - and take it when he has it.<br/></span> </div> <div> <span style="font-size: 12pt;">His wife will be phoning asking when you can take a load.<br/></span> </div> <div> <span style="font-size: 12pt;">Works for me!<br/></span> </div> <div> <span style="font-size: 12pt;">Enjoy the rain<br/></span> </div> <div> <span style="font-size: 12pt;">Paul<br/></span> </div> <div> <span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span> </div> <div> <br/>> On December 24, 2015 at 12:08 PM John and Nhung <nhungjohn@eastlink.ca> wrote: <br/>> <br/>> <br/>> Yeah, I get the impression that the main problem with the Point Tupper <br/>> monster is its size. A smaller operation might have fit in quite nicely. <br/>> Of course, the NewPage surprise added to the mess, but mess it is, and I <br/>> hope the government ad the operators can ramp back its biomass consumption <br/>> to a more sensible, sustainable scale. <br/>> <br/>> Fingers crossed for a mild winter, with minimum demand for firewood! All <br/>> this tells me we still need to take solar heat and other renewable sources <br/>> more seriously. <br/>> <br/>> -----Original Message----- <br/>> From: naturens-owner@chebucto.ns.ca [mailto:naturens-owner@chebucto.ns.ca] <br/>> On Behalf Of Stephen Shaw <br/>> Sent: December 24, 2015 11:59 AM <br/>> To: naturens@chebucto.ns.ca <br/>> Subject: RE: [NatureNS] Red Herring & Forestry <br/>> <br/>> Ed Darby? Abraham Darby I around 1709 modified the blast furnace that had <br/>> already been evolving for over a millenium, to consume coke instead of <br/>> charcoal as the source of carbon that formed the carbon monoxide used to <br/>> reduce raw iron oxide to pig iron, the starting point for other iron <br/>> products. Charcoal gave a purer iron product, but making coke from coal <br/>> proved much cheaper than making charcoal from harvested trees, by then a <br/>> scarce commodity. For both charcoal and coke, a main byproduct was/is CO2 <br/>> gas from the finally oxidised carbon, released into the atmosphere. The <br/>> cheaper Darby coke method, later improved, caught on rapidly: a gnomic irony <br/>> of this is that while saving some of the CO2-consuming much diminished <br/>> forests from approaching extinction, it led rapidly to much greater iron <br/>> production via burning fossil carbon that underpinned the Industrial <br/>> Revolution in Britain, which in turn led to ever increasing CO2 emissions, <br/>> eventually worldwide. <br/>> <br/>> On a lesser point not covered by reporter Aaron Beswick's article in the C-H <br/>> that Dave referred to, if you had tried to get a few cords of 16" cut <br/>> firewood for your wood stove in early 2015, as we did, you would have found <br/>> that initially, none of the local suppliers around Halifax could get any <br/>> logs, because they believed that such wood that had been harvested was <br/>> nearly all going directly to Point Tupper biomass monster, because that had <br/>> been built too large for the available supply of so-called 'waste' wood and <br/>> bark. Central planning at its very best. Our supplier eventually got some <br/>> logs from New Brunswick, but the price went up considerably. <br/>> Steve <br/>> ________________________________________ <br/>> From: naturens-owner@chebucto.ns.ca [naturens-owner@chebucto.ns.ca] on <br/>> behalf of David & Alison Webster [dwebster@glinx.com] <br/>> Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2015 7:12 PM <br/>> To: naturens@chebucto.ns.ca <br/>> Subject: Re: [NatureNS] Red Herring & Forestry <br/>> <br/>> Hi Nick & All, Dec 23, 2015 <br/>> I have only few minutes so will deal with the "gnomic" question first <br/>> and return later to the rest. <br/>> It was a new word to me so I had to consult a dictionary which referred <br/>> me to sententious= Aphoristic, pithy, given to the use of maxims; (of <br/>> persons) = fond of pompous moralizing; maxim= A general truth drawn from <br/>> science or experience. <br/>> I think we should both plead guilty to the "gnomic" charge and be <br/>> flattered. As for the "pompous moralizing"; I am frequently inclined to <br/>> quote the King James Bible but then remember: "Be not righteous over much, <br/>> neither make thyself over wise: why shouldest thou destroy thyself ?"; <br/>> Ecclesiastes 7:16; and decide not to.