next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects
han those</span> <span style=3D'font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>from --f46d0438eb9df4624805194b48d4 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d0438eb9df4624705194b48d3 --f46d0438eb9df4624705194b48d3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Yes that's the wrinkle here, isn't it? Apparently Land's End has a private concern that commercialized that landmark..then Stonehenge ..and I can't forget the "Excalibar" and restaurant just above Arthur's Camelot. Hmmm On Jun 24, 2015 7:36 PM, "John and Nhung" <nhungjohn@eastlink.ca> wrote: > Agreed, aside form the scary precedent this thing may set for future > management of national parks. > > > > *From:* naturens-owner@chebucto.ns.ca [mailto: > naturens-owner@chebucto.ns.ca] *On Behalf Of *Nicholas Hill > *Sent:* June 24, 2015 6:58 PM > *To:* naturens@chebucto.ns.ca > *Subject:* RE: [NatureNS] "Unbiased" evaluation > > > > John > I agree with your point that the decision of how to engage this offer > should be down to the local community. Draw a 10km radius around the site > then hold a plebiscite. There would have to be a 66% approval for the > project to go ahead based only on the vote from this 10 km radius area. > Then, if they are in favour of such an installation, let them > democratically vote on it. > It is none of our business what they decide in my estimation. > Nick > > On Jun 24, 2015 6:32 PM, "John and Nhung" <nhungjohn@eastlink.ca> wrote: > > I share concern for the economy of northern Cape Breton, respect the > voices from that part of the world more than those from the various > supportive luminaries, and remain appalled at the proposal that this be > built in a national park, the main objectives of which should be to > preserve and protect nature, and educate the public therein. > > The most constructive suggestion I have heard so far is that this thing be > built *north* of the park, where the economy is struggling even more. > > -----Original Message----- > From: naturens-owner@chebucto.ns.ca [mailto:naturens-owner@chebucto.ns.ca > <naturens-owner@chebucto.ns.ca>] On Behalf Of David & Alison Webster > Sent: June 24, 2015 9:25 AM > To: NatureNS@chebucto.ns.ca > Subject: [NatureNS] "Unbiased" evaluation > > Dear All, June 24, 2015 > > Interesting article in today's Chron.Hrld. > > > http://thechronicleherald.ca/opinion/1294831-schneidereit-a-monument-in-green-cove-to-conflicts-of-interest > > What a mess. > > DW, Kentville > > > ------------------------------ > > [image: Image removed by sender. Avast logo] > <https://www.avast.com/antivirus> > > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. > www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/antivirus> > > > > > ------------------------------ > [image: Avast logo] <https://www.avast.com/antivirus> > > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. > www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/antivirus> > > --f46d0438eb9df4624705194b48d3 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <p dir=3D"ltr">Yes that's the wrinkle here, isn't it? Apparently La= nd's End has a private concern that commercialized that landmark..then = Stonehenge ..and I can't forget the "Excalibar" and restauran= t just above Arthur's Camelot.<br> Hmmm</p> <div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Jun 24, 2015 7:36 PM, "John and Nhung&qu= ot; <nhungjohn@eastlink.ca&= gt; wrote:<br type=3D"attribution"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style= =3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div lan= g=3D"EN-CA" link=3D"blue" vlink=3D"purple"><div><p class=3D"MsoNormal"><spa= n style=3D"font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-seri= f";color:#1f497d">Agreed, aside form the scary precedent this thing ma= y set for future management of national parks.<u></u><u></u></span></p><p c= lass=3D"MsoNormal"><span style=3D"font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibr= i","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u>=C2=A0<u></u></span></= p><p class=3D"MsoNormal"><b><span lang=3D"EN-US" style=3D"font-size:10.0pt;= font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"">From:</span></b><spa= n lang=3D"EN-US" style=3D"font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma",&= quot;sans-serif""> <a href=3D"mailto:naturens-owner@chebucto.ns.ca" ta= rget=3D"_blank">naturens-owner@chebucto.ns.ca</a> [mailto:<a href=3D"mailto= :naturens-owner@chebucto.ns.ca" target=3D"_blank">naturens-owner@chebucto.n= s.ca</a>] <b>On Behalf Of </b>Nicholas Hill<br><b>Sent:</b> June 24, 2015 6= :58 PM<br><b>To:</b> <a href=3D"mailto:naturens@chebucto.ns.ca" target=3D"_= blank">naturens@chebucto.ns.ca</a><br><b>Subject:</b> RE: [NatureNS] "= Unbiased" evaluation<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class=3D"MsoNormal"><u= ></u>=C2=A0<u></u></p><p>John<br>I agree with your point that the decision = of how to engage this offer should be down to the local community. Draw a 1= 0km radius around the site then hold a plebiscite. There would have to be a= 66% approval for the project to go ahead based only on the vote from this = 10 km radius area. <br>Then, if they are in favour of such an installation,= let them democratically vote on it. <br>It is none of our business what th= ey decide in my estimation. <br>Nick<u></u><u></u></p><div><p class=3D"MsoN= ormal">On Jun 24, 2015 6:32 PM, "John and Nhung" <<a href=3D"m= ailto:nhungjohn@eastlink.ca" target=3D"_blank">nhungjohn@eastlink.ca</a>>= ; wrote:<u></u><u></u></p><div><p><span style=3D"font-family:"Calibri&= quot;,"sans-serif"">I share concern for the economy of northern C= ape Breton, respect the voices from that part of the world more than those<= /span> <span style=3D"font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"= ;">from the various supportive luminaries, and remain appalled at the propo= sal that this be built in</span> <span style=3D"font-family:"Calibri&q= uot;,"sans-serif"">a national park, the main objectives of whic