next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects
ransparent;"><span>I always assu ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stephen Shaw" <srshaw@Dal.Ca> To: <naturens@chebucto.ns.ca> Sent: Monday, August 18, 2014 2:25 AM Subject: RE: [NatureNS] Neolithic stone rings etd. > Hi Dave: You need an astronomer with an interest in history for this, so > stand by, hopefully, for input. > > I've forgotten most Euclid, but how do you subdivide a circle easily ('a > snap') into 12 subunits? I can see how you draw the first line and find > its centre (will become the centre of the circle) with a rawhide > compass-divider, and how you can draw the second diameter at right angles > to this with the same gear, and then complete the circle. You are then > left with a circle with 4 equal quadrants, each of which has to be > subdivided finally into 3 segments to make a total of 12, like the hours > on a clock. Isn't this the difficult problem of trisecting the angle > (bisecting is a snap with a simple compass, but I thought trisection was > not)? Please advise. > Once you've somehow accomplished the trisection of 4 segments into 12 > sub-segments with 30° central angles, then 24, 48, 96... segments are easy > (bisection), as you imply. But subunits of 60 segments are not part of > this series, so that remains rawhide-unexplained too. > Steve (Hfx) > ________________________________________ > From: naturens-owner@chebucto.ns.ca [naturens-owner@chebucto.ns.ca] on > behalf of David & Alison Webster [dwebster@glinx.com] > Sent: Sunday, August 17, 2014 7:34 PM > To: NatureNS@chebucto.ns.ca > Subject: [NatureNS] Neolithic stone rings etd. > > Dear All, Aug 17, 2014 > The August issue of National Geographic has an article that features > the > stone rings and other old (~5000 yrs.) structures of the Orkney Islands. >>From this article & Wikipedia; the circular Ring of Brodgar; spaced for 60 > stones of which 27 remain and the slightly nearly circular but elliptic > (so > they say) ring of the Stones of Stenness; spaced for 12 megaliths with > perhaps 1 or 2 never erected. > > Is it now so widely recognized that such structures served as > observatories (an analog calendar and crude sundial) that it is too > obvious > to mention ? Alignment to the winter solstice at sunset (which would also > fit the summer solstice at sunrise I think) is mentioned but surely these > could have been used to keep track of time throughout the year. > > Even short stones would cast a long shadow at sunrise and sunset and > the > changes in direction with time would be consistent from year to year. A > circular structure with 12 stones is a snap to lay out if you have enough > rawhide and this natural and practicable number likely accounts for our 12 > signs of the zodiac, 12 months of the year and 24 hours in the day. But a > ring with 60 markers is slightly more tricky to lay out, using Neolithic > hardware, then say a ring of 48 or 96. The number 60 has the advantage of > being divisible by 2,3,4,5&6 so the designer of this ring was just a step > away from a 360o circle; dividing a circle into 60 or 360 parts is > essentially the same problem and both have similar advantages if fractions > are difficult to deal with. > > Yt, Dave Wwbster, Kentville > > > > > ----- > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 2014.0.4745 / Virus Database: 4007/8051 - Release Date: 08/17/14 >
next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects