[NatureNS] Neolithic stone rings etd.

From: David & Alison Webster <dwebster@glinx.com>
To: naturens@chebucto.ns.ca
References: <2E12CE5D5AF94026A6FDFF6F3E71D042@D58WQPH1>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 11:25:44 -0300
Precedence: bulk
Return-Path: <naturens-mml-owner@chebucto.ns.ca>
Original-Recipient: rfc822;"| (cd /csuite/info/Environment/FNSN/MList; /csuite/lib/arch2html)"

next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects

ransparent;"&gt;&lt;span&gt;I always assu

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Stephen Shaw" <srshaw@Dal.Ca>
To: <naturens@chebucto.ns.ca>
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2014 2:25 AM
Subject: RE: [NatureNS] Neolithic stone rings etd.


> Hi Dave:  You need an astronomer with an interest in history for this, so 
> stand by, hopefully, for input.
>
> I've forgotten most Euclid, but how do you subdivide a circle easily ('a 
> snap') into 12 subunits?  I can see how you draw the first line and find 
> its centre (will become the centre of the circle) with a rawhide 
> compass-divider, and how you can draw the second diameter at right angles 
> to this with the same gear, and then complete the circle.  You are then 
> left with a circle with 4 equal quadrants, each of which has to be 
> subdivided finally into 3 segments to make a total of 12, like the hours 
> on a clock.  Isn't this the difficult problem of trisecting the angle 
> (bisecting is a snap with a simple compass, but I thought trisection was 
> not)?   Please advise.
> Once you've somehow accomplished the trisection of 4 segments into 12 
> sub-segments with 30° central angles, then 24, 48, 96... segments are easy 
> (bisection), as you imply.  But subunits of 60 segments are not part of 
> this series, so that remains rawhide-unexplained too.
> Steve (Hfx)
> ________________________________________
> From: naturens-owner@chebucto.ns.ca [naturens-owner@chebucto.ns.ca] on 
> behalf of David & Alison Webster [dwebster@glinx.com]
> Sent: Sunday, August 17, 2014 7:34 PM
> To: NatureNS@chebucto.ns.ca
> Subject: [NatureNS] Neolithic stone rings etd.
>
> Dear All,                            Aug 17, 2014
>    The August issue of National Geographic has an article that features 
> the
> stone rings and other old (~5000 yrs.) structures of the Orkney Islands.
>>From this article & Wikipedia; the circular Ring of Brodgar; spaced for 60
> stones of which 27 remain and the slightly nearly circular but elliptic 
> (so
> they say) ring of the Stones of Stenness; spaced for 12 megaliths with
> perhaps 1 or 2 never erected.
>
>    Is it now so widely recognized that such structures served as
> observatories (an analog calendar and crude sundial) that it is too 
> obvious
> to mention ? Alignment to the winter solstice at sunset (which would also
> fit the summer solstice at sunrise I think) is mentioned but surely these
> could have been used to keep track of time throughout the year.
>
>    Even short stones would cast a long shadow at sunrise and sunset and 
> the
> changes in direction  with time would be consistent from year to year. A
> circular structure with 12 stones is a snap to lay out if you have enough
> rawhide and this natural and practicable number likely accounts for our 12
> signs of the zodiac, 12 months of the year and 24 hours in the day. But a
> ring with 60 markers is slightly more tricky to lay out, using Neolithic
> hardware, then say a ring of 48 or 96. The number 60 has the advantage of
> being divisible by 2,3,4,5&6 so the designer of this ring was just a step
> away from a 360o circle; dividing a circle into 60 or 360 parts is
> essentially the same problem and both have similar advantages if fractions
> are difficult to deal with.
>
> Yt, Dave Wwbster, Kentville
>
>
>
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2014.0.4745 / Virus Database: 4007/8051 - Release Date: 08/17/14
> 

next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects