next message in archive
no next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects
Index of Subjects This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_00CC_01CD992F.CDD1E510 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Bruce & All, Sept 23, 2012 Thanks for the enlightenment. =20 But, when light is involved, there are bound to be dark corners.=20 I stumbled across one curious way to measure the speed of light, = when trying to guestimate the relative magnitude of charge on a coaxial = cable. This method involves a parallel plate condenser and, although it = would be very inconvenient to do so, the measurements could be made = while the apparatus was in complete darkness. Without going into detail, with charge Qm & Qs and voltage Vm & Vs = known either by calculation or measurment, where lowcase m & s signify = electromagnetic units (E.M.U.) and electrostatic units (E.S.U.) = respectively, one can then calculate capicitance (C) in the two systems = of units, Cm & Cs. Cm/Cs equals the speed of light, expressed as cm/sec, squared; i.e. = Cm/Cs=3D c^2 =20 and c =3D sqrt(Cm/Cs). Perhaps someone can explain what is behind this (to me) entirely = unexpected relationship. I can send a scan of the relevant pages if = applicable. Yt, Dave Webster, Kentville ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Bruce Stevens=20 To: naturens@chebucto.ns.ca=20 Sent: Friday, September 21, 2012 10:40 PM Subject: Re: [NatureNS] Velocity of light Dave, Nothing you have said is incorrect. A vector is convenient to = represent a quantity that has both a magnitude and direction. Speed is = simply the magnitude (scalar portion) of a velocity vector. If we call = the light vector C, The speed of light (3x10^8 m/s), denoted by c, is = the magnitude of the light vector, or mathematically, ||C||. It is only = necessary to treat light propagation as a vector if the math requires = it. In many situations the speed suffices.=20 Hope this illuminates the situation. Bruce On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 7:44 PM, David & Alison Webster = <dwebster@glinx.com> wrote: Dear All, Sept 21, 2012 The recent discussion about transmission of electricity, reading = of HEAT and reading some of Energy... brings to the forefront a question = that has nagged me for decades. Perhaps someone can clarify. In the typical elementary physics text we are told that velocity = is a vector quantity, and to quote one text "velocity... may be defined = as the rate of change of position in a given direction". But "In cases = where the direction of motion does not require to be considered , the = term speed is employed to express the rate of travelling." Based on the above I would think that the rate of movement of = light should be called speed, i.e. speed of light but I think it is = always called velocity. For example, if light from the sun is reflected from two 45o mirrors = then a beam of light could be directed from the earth back to the sun = and, the velocity would then be minus 3 x 10^10 cm/sec. Or if variously = scattered or reflected then the velocity, relative to the initial sun to = earth direction, would always be less than 3 X 10^10 and after several = reflections might be zero. Is there some good reason why the speed of light is termed = velocity of light ? Or is it called velocity because the textbook = authors forget what they said in chapter one by the time they write = chaper eleven ? (And they all copy from each other) Yt, Dave Webster, Kentville=20 --=20 Bruce Stevens Maryvale, NS No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2012.0.2221 / Virus Database: 2441/5278 - Release Date: = 09/19/12 ------=_NextPart_000_00CC_01CD992F.CDD1E510 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-1" = http-equiv=3DContent-Type> <META name=3DGENERATOR content=3D"MSHTML 8.00.6001.19298"> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff> <DIV><FONT size=3D2>Hi Bruce & All, = =20 = =20 Sept 23, 2012</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2> Thanks for the = enlightenment.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2> </FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2> But, when light is involved, = there are=20 bound to be dark corners. </FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2> I stumbled across one curious way = to=20 measure the speed of light, when trying to guestimate the relative = magnitude of=20 charge on a coaxial cable. This method involves a parallel plate = condenser=20 and, although it would be very inconvenient to do so, the measurements = could be=20 made while the apparatus was in complete darkness.</FONT></DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2> Without going into detail, = with charge=20 Qm & Qs and voltage Vm</FONT> <FONT size=3D2>& Vs = known=20 either by calculation or measurment, where lowcase m & s signify=20 electromagnetic units (E.M.U.) and electrostatic = units (E.S.U.)=20 respectively, one can then calculate capicitance (C) in the two = systems of=20 units, Cm & Cs.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2> Cm/Cs equals the speed of light, = expressed=20 as cm/sec, squared; i.e. Cm/Cs=3D c^2 </FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2> and c=20 =3D sqrt(Cm/Cs).</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2> Perhaps someone can explain what = is behind=20 this (to me) entirely unexpected relationship. I can send a scan of the = relevant=20 pages if applicable.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2>Yt, Dave Webster, Kentville</FONT></DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE=20 style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; = PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"=20 dir=3Dltr> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV> <DIV=20 style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial; BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; font-color: = black"><B>From:</B>=20 <A title=3Dm.bruce.stevens@gmail.com=20 href=3D"mailto:m.bruce.stevens@gmail.com">Bruce Stevens</A> </DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A = title=3Dnaturens@chebucto.ns.ca=20 href=3D"mailto:naturens@chebucto.ns.ca">naturens@chebucto.ns.ca</A> = </DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Friday, September 21, = 2012 10:40=20 PM</DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [NatureNS] = Velocity of=20 light</DIV> <DIV><BR></DIV>Dave, <DIV><BR></DIV> <DIV>Nothing you have said is incorrect. A vector is convenient to = represent a=20 quantity that has both a magnitude and direction. Speed is simply the=20 magnitude (scalar portion) of a velocity vector. If we call the light = vector=20 C, The speed of light (3x10^8 m/s), denoted by c, is the magnitude of = the=20 light vector, or mathematically, ||C||. It is only necessary to treat = light=20 propagation as a vector if the math requires it. In many situations = the speed=20 suffices. </DIV> <DIV><BR></DIV> <DIV>Hope this illuminates the situation. <DIV><BR></DIV> <DIV>Bruce<BR><BR> <DIV class=3Dgmail_quote>On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 7:44 PM, David & = Alison=20 Webster <SPAN dir=3Dltr><<A href=3D"mailto:dwebster@glinx.com"=20 target=3D_blank>dwebster@glinx.com</A>></SPAN> wrote:<BR> <BLOCKQUOTE=20 style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; = PADDING-LEFT: 1ex"=20 class=3Dgmail_quote>Dear All, = =20 Sept 21, 2012<BR> The = recent=20 discussion about transmission of electricity, reading of HEAT and = reading=20 some of Energy... brings to the forefront a question that has nagged = me for=20 decades. Perhaps someone can clarify.<BR><BR> In the = typical=20 elementary physics text we are told that velocity is a vector = quantity, and=20 to quote one text "velocity... may be defined as the rate of change = of=20 position in a given direction". But "In cases where the direction of = motion=20 does not require to be considered , the term speed is employed to = express=20 the rate of travelling."<BR><BR> Based on the above I = would=20 think that the rate of movement of light should be called speed, = i.e. speed=20 of light but I think it is always called velocity.<BR>For example, = if light=20 from the sun is reflected from two 45o mirrors then a beam of light = could be=20 directed from the earth back to the sun and, the velocity would then = be=20 minus 3 x 10^10 cm/sec. Or if variously scattered or reflected then = the=20 velocity, relative to the initial sun to earth direction, would = always be=20 less than 3 X 10^10 and after several reflections might be=20 zero.<BR><BR> Is there some good reason why the speed of = light=20 is termed velocity of light ? Or is it called velocity because the = textbook=20 authors forget what they said in chapter one by the time they write = chaper=20 eleven ? (And they all copy from each other)<BR>Yt, Dave Webster, = Kentville=20 <BR></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV><BR><BR clear=3Dall> <DIV><BR></DIV>-- <BR>Bruce Stevens<BR>Maryvale, = NS<BR></DIV></DIV><A></A> <P align=3Dleft color=3D"#000000" avgcert??>No virus found in this=20 message.<BR>Checked by AVG - <A=20 href=3D"http://www.avg.com">www.avg.com</A><BR>Version: 2012.0.2221 / = Virus=20 Database: 2441/5278 - Release Date: = 09/19/12</P></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML> ------=_NextPart_000_00CC_01CD992F.CDD1E510--
next message in archive
no next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects