next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects
Index of Subjects --_b309024c-3b2c-4182-b3a5-f27c4485f901_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =20 This is one of the main aspects of the GBBC that really ticks off a lot= of people who live in small communities. We have enough trouble maintaini= ng community identities as schools=2C churches=2C and local post offices al= l fall victim to the "bigger is better" mentality. There is no apparent re= ason why the GBBC could not accept the names of all communities=2C just as = eBird does=2C perhaps requiring geographic co-ordinates and county the firs= t time that one is entered. Instead=2C when we enter a name=2C we get the = "There is no record of that locale in our database"=2C and we are required = to enter a postal code or location that=2C as David notes=2C may be as much= as 50km away. This results in such ludicrous reports as Common Eider at M= iddleton or Aylesford. Unfortunately=2C the civic street numbering has not= helped in Nova Scotia=2C Postal codes for most P. O.'s have not been subd= ivided=2C and=2C where they have=2C it is usually by delivery route=2C not = local community=2C and any one of these may still cover 50km or more. Psyc= hologically=2C it has gotten worse in recent years=2C because of Post Offic= e policies requiring us to include our street address with the community na= me where the P. O. is located=2C as though that town had just annexed all t= he surrounding communities (e.g.=2C 562 Messenger Rd.=2C Kingston). I real= ize that GBBC has nothing to do with that=2C but it increases the irritatio= n effect of every other attempt to suppress local names. =20 I hope that the reviewers and anyone else who cares about accurate data = or identities of small communities will encourage Pat Leonard and the GBBC = crew to change this restrictive policy of locality data entry. =20 Cheers=2C Wayne P. Neily 562 Messenger Rd.=2C =20 Tremont=2C Kings Co.=2C Nova Scotia "Go forth=2C under the open sky=2C and list=20 To Nature's teachings." - William Cullen Bryant=2C 1817 [Thanatopsis].=20 =20 > Date: Sun=2C 20 Feb 2011 10:22:07 -0800 > From: suzanneborkowski@yahoo.ca > Subject: Re: [NatureNS] Backyard bird count? > To: naturens@chebucto.ns.ca >=20 > Hi Jeannie=3B >=20 > David Christie's answer is correct. If you're town or community isn't lis= ted=2C and if it doesn't come up when you enter it on the page "Submit Your= Checklist" - then use your postal code only. Leave the community space bla= nk. >=20 > If you're entering sightings for another area=2C and that doesn't come up= =2C enter a postal code of a house or business that is close to where you s= aw birds. >=20 > If you have any other questions=2C just contact me at: >=20 > suzanneborkowski@yahoo.ca >=20 > or phone me at: 445-2922 >=20 > Thanks for participating! >=20 > Suzanne Borkowski > GBBC Reviewer > Nova Scotia >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > --- On Sun=2C 2/20/11=2C David Christie <maryspt@nbnet.nb.ca> wrote: >=20 > > From: David Christie <maryspt@nbnet.nb.ca> > > Subject: Re: [NatureNS] Backyard bird count? > > To: naturens@chebucto.ns.ca=2C jeannies@ns.sympatico.ca > > Received: Sunday=2C February 20=2C 2011=2C 9:24 AM > > At 8:23 PM -0400 2/19/11=2C <jeannies@ns.sympatico.ca> > > wrote: > >=20 > > It won't work for me=2CThe nearest place that I can get to > > come up is Port Hawkesbury and I'm in Cape George > > CB=2CNS.Which is(if you are familiar with the area)=20 > > about 14 km west of St.Peter's. > > Jeannie Shermerhorn > >=20 > >=20 > >=20 > > Jeannie=2C > >=20 > > If Cape George isn't in the location database for the Great > > Backyard Bird Count=2C you probably will have to be content > > entering your rural route postal code which will be recorded > > in a manner such as "B0A 1A0 town-where-the-route-starts." > > In your case=2C I presume=2C that may be Port Hawkesbury. This > > is not very precise because rural routes may be up to 50 or > > more km long=2C but for mapping purposes it does place the > > observations you report in the right district of Nova > > Scotia. > >=20 > > Rural areas that have switched to civic number addressing > > do not have this problem=2C because Canada Post then assigns > > codes tied to their local communities. > >=20 > > Good luck with your observations=2C > >=20 > >=20 > > David Christie > >=20 > > Harvey=2C Albert Co.=2C NB E4H 2M9 > > (formerly Albert=2C NB E0A 1A0) > > http://www3.nbnet.nb.ca/maryspt > > = --_b309024c-3b2c-4182-b3a5-f27c4485f901_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <html> <head> <style><!-- .hmmessage P { margin:0px=3B padding:0px } body.hmmessage { font-size: 10pt=3B font-family:Tahoma } --></style> </head> <body class=3D'hmmessage'>  =3B<BR>  =3B =3B =3B This is one of the main aspects of the GBBC that r= eally ticks off a lot of people who live in small communities. =3B We h= ave enough trouble maintaining community identities as schools=2C churches= =2C and local post offices all fall victim to the "bigger is better" mental= ity. =3B There is no apparent reason why the GBBC could not accept the = names of all communities=2C just as eBird does=2C perhaps requiring =3B= geographic co-ordinates and county =3Bthe first time that =3Bone is= entered. =3B Instead=2C when we enter a name=2C we get the "There is n= o record of that locale in our database"=2C and we are required to enter a = postal code or location that=2C as David notes=2C may be as much as 50km aw= ay. =3B This results in such ludicrous reports as Common Eider at Middl= eton or Aylesford. =3B Unfortunately=2C the civic street numbering has = not helped in Nova Scotia=2C =3B Postal codes for most P. O.'s have not= been subdivided=2C and=2C where they have=2C it is usually by delivery rou= te=2C not local community=2C and any one of these may still cover 50km or m= ore. =3B Psychologically=2C it has gotten worse in recent years=2C beca= use of Post Office policies requiring us to include our street address with= the community name where the P. O. is located=2C as though that town had j= ust annexed all the surrounding communities (e.g.=2C 562 Messenger Rd.=2C K= ingston). =3B I realize that GBBC has nothing to do with that=2C but it= increases the irritation effect =3Bof every other attempt to suppress = local names.<BR>  =3B<BR>  =3B =3B I hope