next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects
could be encouraged to officially re-recognize the term Canada Jay. (After all, --0016e6541d6ccb4be704863e6b82 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I would prefer the Raven as well, but it's the Territorial bird of the Yukon, so won't qualify. Lucky Yukoners, Randy On 10 May 2010 11:29, Brian Bartlett <bbartlett@eastlink.ca> wrote: > Yes, my choice too would be for Gray Jay -- or Raven -- before > Red-tailed Hawk. The choice of a hawk species smacks too much of Canadians > trying to imitate Americans with their "charismatic megafauna" Bald Eagle. > As Ian said on the radio this morning, maybe the powers-that-be could be > encouraged to officially re-recognize the term Canada Jay. (After all, > guides still stick with American Robin, American Wigeon, American Bittern, > American Pipit, American Dipper). As it is, the Gray Jay's Latin name is > still *Perisoreus canadensis*. The variety of common names are another > plus for the bird: Gray Jay, Canada Jay, Whiskey Jack, Gorbie, Moosebird, > etc. > Brian > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Richard Stern <sternrichard@gmail.com> > *To:* naturens@chebucto.ns.ca > *Sent:* Monday, May 10, 2010 11:02 AM > *Subject:* Re: [NatureNS] National bird of Canada > > Hi, > > The Red-tailed Hawk is not Canada's national bird yet! I heard Ian and > James Cowan on the radio this morning, and I agree with Ian's comments about > the Gray Jay. I also like the idea of the Common Raven, as I did many years > ago when we debated NS's provincial bird. It's clever, hardy, doesn't mind > cold weather or rugged terrain, adaptable, stays in Canada all year round, > has lots of symbolism for native peoples, has great charisma, has a > spectacular display and great flight powers, etc. > > Richard > > On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Don MacNeill <donmacneill@eastlink.ca>wrote: > >> The Red-tailed Hawk's voice is often used in movies whenever a Bald >> Eagle is shown. The Bald Eagle's twitterings are probably not considered to >> be majestic enough. It would be interesting that the Americans' national >> bird have the voice of the Canadian national bird. >> >> Don >> >> Don MacNeill >> donmacneill@eastlink.ca >> ----- Original Message ----- >> *From:* Elizabeth Doull <edoull@ns.sympatico.ca> >> *To:* naturens@chebucto.ns.ca >> *Sent:* Friday, May 07, 2010 11:01 AM >> *Subject:* [NatureNS] National bird of Canada >> >> Red-tailed hawk soaring above competitors in search for Canada's >> national bird >> >> PAT HEWITT, Metro News >> >> May 06, 2010 >> > _________________________________ RF Lauff Way in the boonies of Antigonish County, NS. --0016e6541d6ccb4be704863e6b82 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I would prefer the Raven as well, but it's the Territorial bird of the = Yukon, so won't qualify.<div><br></div><div>Lucky Yukoners,</div><div>R= andy<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On 10 May 2010 11:29, Brian Bartlett= <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:bbartlett@eastlink.ca">bbartlett@e= astlink.ca</a>></span> wrote:<br> <blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p= x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"> <div bgcolor=3D"#ffffff"> <div><font size=3D"2" face=3D"Arial">Yes, my choice too would be for Gray J= ay -- or=20 Raven=A0 -- before Red-tailed Hawk. The choice of a hawk species smacks too= =20 much of Canadians trying to imitate Americans with their "charismatic = megafauna"=20 Bald Eagle. As Ian said on the radio this morning, maybe the powers-that-be= =20 could be encouraged to officially re-recognize the term Canada Jay. (After = all,=20 guides still stick with American Robin, American Wigeon, American Bittern,= =20 American Pipit,=A0American Dipper). As it is, the Gray Jay's Latin name= is=20 still <em>Perisoreus canadensis</em>. The variety of common names are anoth= er=20 plus=A0for the bird: Gray Jay, Canada Jay, Whiskey Jack, Gorbie, Moosebird,= =20 etc. </font></div> <div><font size=3D"2" face=3D"Arial">Brian</font></div><font color=3D"#8888= 88"> </font><blockquote style=3D"border-left:#000000 2px solid;padding-left:5px;= padding-right:0px;margin-left:5px;margin-right:0px"><div class=3D"im"> <div style=3D"font:10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </div> <div style=3D"font:10pt arial;background:#e4e4e4"><b>From:</b>=20 <a title=3D"sternrichard@gmail.com" href=3D"mailto:sternrichard@gmail.com= " target=3D"_blank">Richard=20 Stern</a> </div> </div><div class=3D"im"><div style=3D"font:10pt arial"><b>To:</b> <a titl= e=3D"naturens@chebucto.ns.ca" href=3D"mailto:naturens@chebucto.ns.ca" targe= t=3D"_blank">naturens@chebucto.ns.ca</a> </div> </div><div class=3D"im"><div style=3D"font:10pt arial"><b>Sent:</b> Monda= y, May 10, 2010 11:02 AM</div> </div><div><div></div><div class=3D"h5"><div style=3D"font:10pt arial"><b= >Subject:</b> Re: [NatureNS] National bird of=20 Canada</div> <div><br></div>Hi,<br><br>The Red-tailed Hawk is not Canada's nationa= l bird=20 yet!=A0=A0 I heard Ian and James Cowan on the radio this morning, and I= =20 agree with Ian's comments about the Gray Jay. I also like the idea of= the=20 Common Raven, as I did many years ago when we debated NS's provincial= bird.=20 It's clever, hardy, doesn't mind cold weather or rugged terrain, = adaptable,=20 stays in Canada all year round, has lots of symbolism for native peoples,= has=20 great charisma, has a spectacular display and great flight powers,=20 etc.<br><br>Richard<br><br> <div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Don MacNeill = <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:donmacneill@eastlink.ca" target=3D"= _blank">donmacneill@eastlink.ca</a>></span>=20 wrote:<br> <blockquote style=3D"border-left:rgb(204,204,204) 1px solid;margin:0pt 0p= t 0pt 0.8ex;padding-left:1ex" class=3D"gmail_quote"> <div bgcolor=3D"#ffffff"> <div><font size=3D"2" face=3D"Arial">The Red-tailed Hawk's voice is= often used in=20 movies whenever a Bald Eagle is shown.=A0 The Bald Eagle's twitteri= ngs=20 are probably=A0not=A0considered to be majestic enough