next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects
Index of Subjects This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_02AE_01CACF6A.6AB96B60 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Chris, Mar 29, 2010 You are correct re disadvantages of incandescent bulbs in the = multi-unit commercial setting where excess heat is frequently a disposal = problem.=20 I had intended to restrict my defense of incandescent to the = single-unit residential context but forgot to spell this out. DW ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Christopher Majka=20 To: naturens@chebucto.ns.ca=20 Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 2:53 PM Subject: Re: [NatureNS] Earth Hour success?; long Hi Dave, On 29-Mar-10, at 2:16 PM, David & Alison Webster wrote: Hi Wayne & All, March 28, 2010 Pogo, in about 1957, said it long before limits to growth and = said it best, while looking our over a swamp fouled with tires, auto = batteries, cans, bottles, etc.; "I have seen the enemy and he is us." These earth hour sessions may have some positive consequences = but I wonder if earlier sessions are responsible in part for the idea = that incandescent bulbs are somehow undesirable. [In our latitude nearly = all of the heat generated by incandescent bulbs is welcome; apart from = 15-20 evenings per year.] In 2007 I calculated our estimated annual = usage of power for lights as a percentage of average residential power = use; a whopping 4.5% ! Has the message been corrupted by simplistic interpretation and = the desire, in some quarters, to finally find a market for fluorescent = bulbs ? Out previous government established Conserve NS, partly to push = fluorescent bulbs and our present government plans to (perhaps has) move = this function to a private agency. One effective way to conserve energy = would have been to turn off the lights at Conserve NS and spin-offs; = permanently. Rather that pull the main switch for one hour per year, surely = the message would be more convincing if one were to use power sparingly = for some 8700 hours per year. I take your point, however, I wouldn't be so quick to discount the = importance of symbolic acts. No one associated with Earth Hour pretends = that turning off/down the power for one hour is the answer to climate = change. The message is intended to both: 1. Draw attention to the issue of wasteful use of resources (such as = power) on the part of the public, thereby contributing to making people = consider (and perhaps even act upon that consideration!) what they could = do more intelligently and frugally over the remaining 8,759 hours; and 2. Collectively exhibit that broad public support (i.e., translatable = to electoral support) that will help galvanize or empower politicians to = take similar policy and legislative steps. Also, I don't think the energy wasted with incandescent bulbs is so = easily dismissed (a rather poor way to heat a house, I should think ... = ;->). I recently saw the results of a study commissioned in the USA (New = York sate, I believe, but it could have been Massachusetts) on the = savings that would be realized by changing all the light bulbs in public = buildings (hospitals, police stations, government office buildings, = etc.) from incandescent to fluorescent. It worked out to the energy = equivalent of removing several thousands of vehicles from the road (I = can't put my fingers on the story, and hence the exact number). As for fluorescent bulbs, when I bought my present house ~ 8 years ago = I installed them wherever possible throughout the house. I bought 2-3 = spares as well, to have on hand when they needed replacing. In that time = I haven't had to change a single one and my spares gather dust in the = basement ... ;-> Cheers! Chris Christopher Majka Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada B3H 2G5 c.majka@ns.sympatico.ca Nothing in life is difficult except putting your pants on over your = head. - Nikita Khrushchev -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ----- Internal Virus Database is out of date. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com=20 Version: 8.5.437 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2754 - Release Date: = 03/18/10 07:33:00 ------=_NextPart_000_02AE_01CACF6A.6AB96B60 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-1" = http-equiv=3DContent-Type> <META name=3DGENERATOR content=3D"MSHTML 8.00.6001.18876"> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY=20 style=3D"WORD-WRAP: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; = -webkit-line-break: after-white-space"=20 bgColor=3D#ffffff> <DIV><FONT size=3D2 face=3DArial>Hi Chris, = =20 Mar 29, 2010</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2 face=3DArial> You are correct re = disadvantages=20 of incandescent bulbs in the multi-unit commercial setting = where=20 excess heat is frequently a disposal problem. </FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2 face=3DArial></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2 face=3DArial> I had intended to = restrict my=20 defense of incandescent to the single-unit residential context but = forgot to=20 spell this out.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2 face=3DArial>DW</FONT></DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE=20 style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; = PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV> <DIV=20 style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial; BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; font-color: = black"><B>From:</B>=20 <A title=3Dc.majka@ns.sympatico.ca=20 href=3D"mailto:c.majka@ns.sympatico.ca">Christopher Majka</A> </DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A = title=3Dnaturens@chebucto.ns.ca=20 href=3D"mailto:naturens@chebucto.ns.ca">naturens@chebucto.ns.ca</A> = </DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Monday, March 29, 2010 = 2:53=20 PM</DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [NatureNS] Earth = Hour=20 success?; long</DIV> <DIV><BR></DIV>Hi Dave, <DIV><BR> <DIV> <DIV>On 29-Mar-10, at 2:16 PM, David & Alison Webster = wrote:</DIV>