next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects
Index of Subjects --Boundary_(ID_syvVIm5dhpFoaEsjiLUHQA) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT I remember years ago seeing a movie about meteorology which showed a radar signal caused by birds in England soaring on the "cold nose" (or "gust front") of a thunderstorm, where they were feeding on insects lifted by approaching storm. Since that time, Doppler weather radar has become much more precise, and will show signatures of large numbers of migrating birds. Here is an article which mentions this: http://www.nwrc.usgs.gov/factshts/2005-3067.pdf and another on "Radar Ornithology": http://www.gcbo.org/default.aspx?MenuItemID=157&&AspxAutoDetectCookieSupport=1 and another report: http://www.fort.usgs.gov/Products/Publications/22018/22018.pdf and still another: http://www.fort.usgs.gov/Products/Publications/21468/21468.pdf On 18 Sep 2009, at 9:05 PM, Chris Callaghan/Andy Moir wrote: > There was a very interesting segment tonight on Discovery Channel's > Daily Planet, about the millions of birds showing up on radar moving > south out of Ontario. They were talking about millions of birds > moving. However, when I look at the radar shots available from > Environment Canada, I don't see anything like they were > showing.Anybody have any idea where they got their radar shots, and > how they were doctored to show birds, and not precipitation? > Andy in Freeport --Boundary_(ID_syvVIm5dhpFoaEsjiLUHQA) Content-type: text/html; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable <html><body style=3D"word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; = -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">I remember years ago seeing a = movie about meteorology which showed a radar signal caused by birds in = England soaring on the "cold nose" (or "gust front") of a thunderstorm, = where they were feeding on insects lifted by approaching = storm.<div><br></div><div>Since that time, Doppler weather radar has = become much more precise, and will show signatures of large numbers of = migrating birds. Here is an article which mentions = this:</div><div><a = href=3D"http://www.nwrc.usgs.gov/factshts/2005-3067.pdf">http://www.nwrc.u= sgs.gov/factshts/2005-3067.pdf</a></div><div><br></div><div>and another = on "Radar Ornithology": <a = href=3D"http://www.gcbo.org/default.aspx?MenuItemID=3D157&&AspxAut= oDetectCookieSupport=3D1">http://www.gcbo.org/default.aspx?MenuItemID=3D15= 7&&AspxAutoDetectCookieSupport=3D1</a></div><div><br></div><div>an= d another report: <a = href=3D"http://www.fort.usgs.gov/Products/Publications/22018/22018.pdf">ht= tp://www.fort.usgs.gov/Products/Publications/22018/22018.pdf</a></div><div= ><br></div><div>and still another: <a = href=3D"http://www.fort.usgs.gov/Products/Publications/21468/21468.pdf">ht= tp://www.fort.usgs.gov/Products/Publications/21468/21468.pdf</a></div><div= ><br></div><div><br><div><div>On 18 Sep 2009, at 9:05 PM, Chris = Callaghan/Andy Moir wrote:</div><br = class=3D"Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type=3D"cite"><div = bgcolor=3D"#ffffff"><div><font size=3D"2" face=3D"Arial">There was a = very interesting segment tonight on Discovery Channel's Daily Planet, = about the millions of birds showing up on radar moving south out of = Ontario. They were talking about millions of birds moving. = However, when I look at the radar shots available from Environment = Canada, I don't see anything like they were showing.Anybody have any = idea where they got their radar shots, and how they were doctored to = show birds, and not precipitation?</font></div><div><font size=3D"2" = face=3D"Arial">Andy in = Freeport</font></div></div></blockquote></div><br></div></body></html>= --Boundary_(ID_syvVIm5dhpFoaEsjiLUHQA)--
next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects