next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects
<p><span style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; COLOR: windowtext">"Similarly, distinctive lifestyles (such as nocturnal, raptorial and pelagic, i.e., living on the ocean or open seas) evolved several times. For example, contrary to conventional thinking, colorful, daytime hummingbirds evolved from drab nocturnal
I guess you're just being provocative, Randy?
Steve
Quoting Randy Lauff <randy.lauff@gmail.com>:
> Y'know, we hear this every few years, especially since the molecular people
> ("gene jockeys") got their hands on birds' DNA.
>
> "Second, much of bird classification and conventional wisdom on the
> evolutionary relationships of birds is wrong."
>
> Possibly so. But that doesn't mean that what these authors are proposing is
> correct. Or even better. Just wait...in two years, a new technique will come
> on board and we'll have another complete revision.
>
> Randy
> Antigonish Co.
> 2008/6/27 Wild Flora <herself@wildflora.com>:
next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects