next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects
Index of Subjects Well, given the scope of the journal in which this REVIEW article was published (Journal American Physicians and Surgeons) it makes me personally wonder why this review article wasn't published in a journal with a more appropriate scope, readership, and referees ....... And how it made it into this journal since it is not really fitting into the usual landscape ............. Looks to me that it was either turned down by those journals, or there was the intention of the authors to fly low under the radar screen to avoid critical and qualified discussion ...... Same applies to the 31000 American scientists that signed the petition....... Who are those people and what is their expertise? What I want to say is that it is very easy to get mislead and blindsided. Facts can be interpreted in many different ways, and review articles are not only a presentation of other people data it's also an interpretation by a third person who picked those "references" in the first place. Anyway I have a few red flags going up! Ulli > Very true, David. When faced with a choice between an unsigned, abusive > article on a website and a website which shows a signed 12 page review > article which was published in a scientific journal and is here > accompanied by 31, 000 signatures of scientists in agreement with it, I > know which to choose. > > Lois Codling
next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects