[NatureNS] suet with flour - oops

DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 12:59:41 -0400
From: "Randy Lauff" <randy.lauff@gmail.com>
To: naturens@chebucto.ns.ca
References: <cdbbab570801091734i72b230c2u1794defab029ca31@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
Return-Path: <naturens-mml-owner@chebucto.ns.ca>
Original-Recipient: rfc822;"| (cd /csuite/info/Environment/FNSN/MList; /csuite/lib/arch2html)"

next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects

ger&gt;=A0&lt;/bigger&gt;&lt;/color&gt;&lt;/fo
------=_Part_6633_10033483.1200157181431
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

I wonder about the need to add sugar, as some recipees call for (and I
wonder more strongly about adding salt). There is little free sucrose (table
sugar) in wild foods...I think most carbohydrate that is stored is stored as
starch...but I'm open to hear from someone more botannically inclined than
me on this. (The notable exceptions being sugar cane and sugar beets...not
likely candidates as wild food up here). Undoubtedly, the birds can digest
sucrose, but do they have enough machinery (enzymes) to deal with the load
that the recipees call for? Is the salt in suet recipees there for the
birds, or as a preservative? Again, I doubt the birds need the excess sodium
or chloride (the two bits that make up table salt). Or is it the added
Iodine that is thought to be a benefit (that written a bit tongue-in-cheek)?

The good news to my story is that the butcher had about 5 kilos ground up
for me on Friday morning (about $7). The birds had not touched that
cherry/millet/suet mix (I had to remove it from my suet log) but they did
feed on the Maple Leaf suet/flour mix). This morning, I could ~almost~ see
the woodpeckers smiling (I have seen four hairies at once so far!), and they
seemed content.

Randy
_________________________________
RF Lauff
Way in the boonies of
Antigonish County, NS.

------=_Part_6633_10033483.1200157181431
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

<div>I wonder about the need to add sugar, as some recipees call for (and I wonder more strongly about adding salt). There is little free sucrose (table sugar) in wild foods...I think most carbohydrate that is stored&nbsp;is stored as starch...but I&#39;m open to hear from someone more botannically inclined than me on this. (The notable exceptions being sugar cane and sugar beets...not likely candidates as wild food up here). Undoubtedly, the birds can digest sucrose, but do they have enough machinery (enzymes) to deal with the load that the recipees call for? Is the salt in suet recipees there for the birds, or as a preservative? Again, I doubt the birds need the excess sodium or chloride (the two bits that make up table salt). Or is it the added Iodine that is thought to be a benefit (that written a bit tongue-in-cheek)?
<br>&nbsp;</div>
<div>The good news to my story is that the butcher had about 5 kilos ground up for me on Friday morning (about $7). The birds had not touched that cherry/millet/suet mix (I had to remove it from my suet log) but they did feed on the Maple Leaf suet/flour mix). This morning, I could ~almost~ see the woodpeckers smiling (I have seen four hairies at once so far!), and they seemed content.
</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>Randy<br>_________________________________<br>RF Lauff<br>Way in the boonies of<br>Antigonish County, NS. </div>

------=_Part_6633_10033483.1200157181431--

next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects