[NatureNS] Comet Holmes observation

References: <BAY135-W4307F042E8815EC38571B3A9850@phx.gbl> <001901c823a3$df269bf0$1402a8c0@laptop> <E232405A-D85A-4CFD-958E-12E44035ECEC@xcountry.tv>
From: Patrick Kelly <patrick.kelly@dal.ca>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 21:14:09 -0400
To: naturens@chebucto.ns.ca
Precedence: bulk
Return-Path: <naturens-mml-owner@chebucto.ns.ca>
Original-Recipient: rfc822;"| (cd /csuite/info/Environment/FNSN/MList; /csuite/lib/arch2html)"

next message in archive
no next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects

Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-

--Apple-Mail-59--286598340
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=ISO-8859-1;
	delsp=yes;
	format=flowed

Hi eveyrone:

I just came in from looking at Holmes before the clouds moved in (9:00 =20=

PM). While the comet is not as bright as it once was visually, it has =20=

gotten a lot larger as viewed through a telescope. If I et a chance =20
I'll scann in the three sketches that I have made and postt hem so that =20=

you can see the increase in size...

Pat


On Nov 12, 2007, at 8:02 PM, Sherman Williams wrote:

> I've just come in from having a quick look at Comet Holmes this =20
> evening; the sky is clearing out.=A0 This may be the last opportunity =20=

> for a while to have a look before=A0 moonlight begins to wash out the =20=

> sky contrast again (more c;oudy weather in the forecast coming later =20=

> through the night). Theere was a thin crescent of the New Moon =20
> visible, earlier this evening.=A0 Its location has not changed =20
> much....just a little nearer Mirfak.
>
> I am copying my message sent to the RASC list earlier today, reporting =
=20
> on an observation I made this morning.=A0 The comet diameter, in real =20=

> size, has now expanded to about 1.5 million km. What I think is most =20=

> neat about the comet is the binocular star field it is combined with.
>
> I'll also include Roy's response. Note also, his closing report on the =
=20
> crescent moon this evening.
>
> All the best,
>
> Sherman
>
> *****************=A0 COMET HOLMES early this morning (Monday)=A0 =20
> *************************Finally, early this morning, I got in a nice =20=

> observation session of Comet Holmes after a few days of limited or no =20=

> views due to cloud and bad weather.
>>
>> I had the comet in my binoculars by 05:20 AST, high in the WNW.
>> Using the out-of-focus mode (in 10x50s and my nearsighted eyes), it =20=

>> seems to be dimmer than delta Persei(3.0), so I'm putting it at about =
=20
>> Mag 3.2.
>>
>> It is at the NE fringe of the rich open cluster of stars associated =20=

>> with Mirfak (alpha Persei).
>> The combination of this star field and Comet Holmes' wide, fuzzy =20
>> diameter make a magnificent sight in 10X50 binoculars. My book on =20
>> viewing the sky in binoculars (P.S.Harrington) refers to this group =20=

>> as Melotte 20, off about 550 ly from us.
>>
>> The view in my 255 mm at 48X and 94X, was quite interesting too. The =20=

>> coma was decorated with
>> several fine points of 10th, 11th, and 12th magnitude stars in the =20=

>> background. Of these,
>> one mag 7.3 star was brightly shining just beyond the western fringe =20=

>> of the coma.
>> This was also quite noticable in my binoculars.
>>
>> Another star, about mag 10.8(Starry Night), was easily seen within =20=

>> the nuclear region, quite near to where we have been seeing the =20
>> bright nuclear spot. I thought the star-like part of the nucleus was =20=

>> just barely visible, but now I'm not sure if I was seeing it, because =
=20
>> my Starry Night star field shows that there was an 11th mag star in =20=

>> just about the same position. Perhaps someone else can enlighten =20
>> further on the detail in the nuclear region. Certainly it is not as =20=

>> obvious as it once was.
>>
>> The bright zone in the central region seems narrower and =20
>> concentrated, especially as it elongates to the SW, centrally aligned =
=20
>> with what becomes the tail zone (my Starry Night gives it a pa in the =
=20
>> vicinity of 200 degrees).
>> I did not detect any definite tail structure beyond the coma, other =20=

>> than an elevated glow in the SW direction, extending just beyond the =20=

>> coma. On that same side of the coma the edge is noticeably closer to =20=

>> a fuzzy "flat line" boundry rather than a curved, distinct line like =20=

>> the rest of the coma edge (like someone chopped off the curved edge =20=

>> on the SW side). In some of the recent shared, technical, digitally =20=

>> processed photos, this is where we are seeing tail structure leaving =20=

>> the comet. Such structure, however, was not visible in either my =20
>> telescope nor binoculars, only an indistinct glow was noticed. Last =20=

>> week, using my binoculars, I could detect some tail structure that =20=

>> had a definite boundary to it and extending off to the NE about 1.3 =20=

>> degrees.
>>
>> I did a couple of timings to get a number on the actual increase in =20=

>> diameter since last Wednesday.
>> My times (taken between 05:35 and 05:43 averaged out to 157.7 =
seconds.
>> Using the calculation Roy (Bishop) introduced to our discussion, I =20=

>> get 25.1 min of arc.
>> Using the star field Starry Night shows (and that I recognized in the =
=20
>> eyepiece at the fringe of the coma ) plus the little angle measure =20=

>> mode SN provides, it gives a diameter of about 27.2 min of arc.
>>
>> =46rom 05:50 to 06:00 AST I turned my attention to Mars, Saturn, =
Venus =20
>> and Mercury, in that order. The first three planets were seen well, =20=

>> Mercury I did not see (it is still very low and clouds were in that =20=

>> part of the horizon). Saturn is beginning to look like it has a peg =20=

>> stuck through the disk. The rings are really closing up.
>>
>> Long winded as usual,
>> =A0 Sherman
>
>> Sherman,
>>
>> I was asleep at 5:40 this morning, and I am glad you were not! Your =20=

>> measured diameter for the main disk of Holmes (25.1' timed, 27.2' =20
>> based on the star field) agrees with my time measurements during the =20=

>> period October 26 to November 2. The latter measurements fit a linear =
=20
>> equation:
>>
>> Diameter in arc minutes =3D 1.444 x (6.51 + (November AST decimal =
day))
>>
>> which for 05:40 AST November 12 gives: 1.444 x (6.51 + 12.236) =3D =
27.1'
>>
>> in good agreement with your estimates. Thus the linear expansion =20
>> continues!
>> It will be interesting to see how long this behavior lasts (and can =20=

>> be observed).
>>
>> The time of the "explosion" can be calculated from the equation: Set =20=

>> Diameter =3D 0 and solve for the date. This gives November -6.51 or =20=

>> October 24.49 AST =3D October 24.66 UT. The first observation that =20=

>> reported Holmes to be acting up was from the Canary Islands on =20
>> October 24.07 UT, so the explosion occurred more than 0.59 day before =
=20
>> October 24.66 UT which indicates that during the first several hours =20=

>> the ejected material was being accelerated outward (that is, the =20
>> expansion was not yet a linear function of time).
>>
>> Note that the above equation is preliminary in that it does not =20
>> include all my data and it does not take account of the varying =20
>> distance of Holmes from Earth. However that distance has been =20
>> remarkably almost constant (less than a 1% change over the past two =20=

>> weeks).
>>
>> Incidentally, I just watched the crescent Moon set (at 17:55 AST). It =
=20
>> was remarkably far south of west, a vertical, orange scimitar slicing =
=20
>> along behind trees on the South Mountain. The Observer's Handbook =20
>> puts the Moon at maximum southern declination tonight, -28 degrees, =20=

>> almost as low as it can get in our sky (due to the 18.6-year wobble =20=

>> of its orbital plane, as mentioned on p. 79 of the current Handbook). =
=20
>> To see the Moon so low in that part of the sky indicates that the =20
>> evening may be clear later on, a chance for another measurement of =20=

>> Holmes!
>
> Sherman Williams
> shermw@xcountry.tv
>
>
>
>
>
>

=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=20
=3D=3D
Patrick Kelly
Director of Computer Facilities
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=20
=3D=3D
Faculty of Architecture and Planning
Dalhousie University
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=20
=3D=3D
PO Box 1000 Stn Central                5410 Spring Garden Road
Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 2X4           Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 2X4
Canada                                 Canada
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=20
=3D=3D
Phone:(902) 494-3294    FAX:(902) 423-6672   E-mail:patrick.kelly@dal.ca
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=20
=3D=3D


--Apple-Mail-59--286598340
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/enriched;
	charset=ISO-8859-1

Hi eveyrone:


I just came in from looking at Holmes before the clouds moved in (9:00
PM). While the comet is not as bright as it once was visually, it has
gotten a lot larger as viewed through a telescope. If I et a chance
I'll scann in the three sketches that I have made and postt hem so
that you can see the increase in size...


Pat



On Nov 12, 2007, at 8:02 PM, Sherman Williams wrote:


<excerpt>I've just come in from having a quick look at Comet Holmes
this evening; the sky is clearing out.=A0 This may be the last
opportunity for a while to have a look before=A0 moonlight begins to
wash out the sky contrast again (more c;oudy weather in the forecast
coming later through the night). Theere was a thin crescent of the New
Moon visible, earlier this evening.=A0 Its location has not changed
much....just a little nearer Mirfak.


I am copying my message sent to the RASC list earlier today, reporting
on an observation I made this morning.=A0 The comet diameter, in real
size, has now expanded to about 1.5 million km. What I think is most
neat about the comet is the binocular star field it is combined with.


I'll also include Roy's response. Note also, his closing report on the
crescent moon this evening.


All the best,


Sherman


*****************=A0 COMET HOLMES early this morning (Monday)=A0
*************************Finally, early this morning, I got in a nice
observation session of Comet Holmes after a few days of limited or no
views due to cloud and bad weather.

<excerpt>

I had the comet in my binoculars by 05:20 AST, high in the WNW.

Using the out-of-focus mode (in 10x50s and my nearsighted eyes), it
seems to be dimmer than delta Persei(3.0), so I'm putting it at about
Mag 3.2.


It is at the NE fringe of the rich open cluster of stars associated
with Mirfak (alpha Persei).

The combination of this star field and Comet Holmes' wide, fuzzy
diameter make a magnificent sight in 10X50 binoculars. My book on
viewing the sky in binoculars (P.S.Harrington) refers to this group as
Melotte 20, off about 550 ly from us.


The view in my 255 mm at 48X and 94X, was quite interesting too. The
coma was decorated with

several fine points of 10th, 11th, and 12th magnitude stars in the
background. Of these,

one mag 7.3 star was brightly shining just beyond the western fringe
of the coma.

This was also quite noticable in my binoculars.


Another star, about mag 10.8(Starry Night), was easily seen within the
nuclear region, quite near to where we have been seeing the bright
nuclear spot. I thought the star-like part of the nucleus was just
barely visible, but now I'm not sure if I was seeing it, because my
Starry Night star field shows that there was an 11th mag star in just
about the same position. Perhaps someone else can enlighten further on
the detail in the nuclear region. Certainly it is not as obvious as it
once was.


The bright zone in the central region seems narrower and concentrated,
especially as it elongates to the SW, centrally aligned with what
becomes the tail zone (my Starry Night gives it a pa in the vicinity
of 200 degrees).

I did not detect any definite tail structure beyond the coma, other
than an elevated glow in the SW direction, extending just beyond the
coma. On that same side of the coma the edge is noticeably closer to a
fuzzy "flat line" boundry rather than a curved, distinct line like the
rest of the coma edge (like someone chopped off the curved edge on the
SW side). In some of the recent shared, technical, digitally processed
photos, this is where we are seeing tail structure leaving the comet.
Such structure, however, was not visible in either my telescope nor
binoculars, only an indistinct glow was noticed. Last week, using my
binoculars, I could detect some tail structure that had a definite
boundary to it and extending off to the NE about 1.3 degrees.


I did a couple of timings to get a number on the actual increase in
diameter since last Wednesday.

My times (taken between 05:35 and 05:43 averaged out to 157.7 seconds.

Using the calculation Roy (Bishop) introduced to our discussion, I get
25.1 min of arc.

Using the star field Starry Night shows (and that I recognized in the
eyepiece at the fringe of the coma ) plus the little angle measure
mode SN provides, it gives a diameter of about 27.2 min of arc.


=46rom 05:50 to 06:00 AST I turned my attention to Mars, Saturn, Venus
and Mercury, in that order. The first three planets were seen well,
Mercury I did not see (it is still very low and clouds were in that
part of the horizon). Saturn is beginning to look like it has a peg
stuck through the disk. The rings are really closing up.


Long winded as usual,

=A0 Sherman

</excerpt>

<excerpt>Sherman,


I was asleep at 5:40 this morning, and I am glad you were not! Your
measured diameter for the main disk of Holmes (25.1' timed, 27.2'
based on the star field) agrees with my time measurements during the
period October 26 to November 2. The latter measurements fit a linear
equation:


Diameter in arc minutes =3D 1.444 x (6.51 + (November AST decimal day))


which for 05:40 AST November 12 gives: 1.444 x (6.51 + 12.236) =3D 27.1'


in good agreement with your estimates. Thus the linear expansion
continues!

It will be interesting to see how long this behavior lasts (and can be
observed).


The time of the "explosion" can be calculated from the equation: Set
Diameter =3D 0 and solve for the date. This gives November -6.51 or
October 24.49 AST =3D October 24.66 UT. The first observation that
reported Holmes to be acting up was from the Canary Islands on October
24.07 UT, so the explosion occurred more than 0.59 day before October
24.66 UT which indicates that during the first several hours the
ejected material was being accelerated outward (that is, the expansion
was not yet a linear function of time).


Note that the above equation is preliminary in that it does not
include all my data and it does not take account of the varying
distance of Holmes from Earth. However that distance has been
remarkably almost constant (less than a 1% change over the past two
weeks).


Incidentally, I just watched the crescent Moon set (at 17:55 AST). It
was remarkably far south of west, a vertical, orange scimitar slicing
along behind trees on the South Mountain. The Observer's Handbook puts
the Moon at maximum southern declination tonight, -28 degrees, almost
as low as it can get in our sky (due to the 18.6-year wobble of its
orbital plane, as mentioned on p. 79 of the current Handbook). To see
the Moon so low in that part of the sky indicates that the evening may
be clear later on, a chance for another measurement of Holmes!

</excerpt>

Sherman Williams

<color><param>0000,0000,EEEE</param>shermw@xcountry.tv</color>







</excerpt><fontfamily><param>Courier</param>

=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D

Patrick Kelly

Director of Computer Facilities

=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D

Faculty of Architecture and Planning

Dalhousie University

=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D

PO Box 1000 Stn Central                5410 Spring Garden Road

Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 2X4           Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 2X4

Canada                                 Canada

=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D

Phone:(902) 494-3294    FAX:(902) 423-6672 =20
E-mail:patrick.kelly@dal.ca

=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D

</fontfamily>


--Apple-Mail-59--286598340--

next message in archive
no next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects