[NatureNS] two moths ID - oops

Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 21:42:14 -0700
From: Stephen Shaw <srshaw@dal.ca>
To: naturens@chebucto.ns.ca
References: <000c01c7c7ec$1dff0510$5027fea9@D572TL41>
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.0.3)
Precedence: bulk
Return-Path: <naturens-mml-owner@chebucto.ns.ca>
Original-Recipient: rfc822;"| (cd /csuite/info/Environment/FNSN/MList; /csuite/lib/arch2html)"

next message in archive
no next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects

href=3D"http://outdoors.webshots.com/photo/2917419830025930195IxTeCq"&gt;http
Exactly so, Chris is right, I should have remembered that.  Excuse?  I had a
couple of pages stuck together in my Milne & Milne 'Audubon Field 
Guide' and so
shot right through the front page of the Saturnidae.
Steve
********************
Quoting c.majka@ns.sympatico.ca:
> Hi Steve,
> Spot only, only that both moths are in the Saturnidae (silk moths)  
> and not the Lasiocampidae.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Chris
>
> On 17-Jul-07, at 12:57 AM, Stephen Shaw wrote:
>
>> Jeannie:  Regarding the composite photo with the added inset of the  
>> second moth,
>> they are different species but in the same family Lasiocampidae.  
>> The main photo
>> (paler specimen, a bit out of focus) shows a Polyphemus moth,  Antheraea
>> polyphemus.  The second, darker, inset moth (nice photo) is a  
>> Cecropia moth,
>> Hyalophora cecropia. Looking at the antennae, both appear to be males.
>>
>> You have 'h-e-l-p' in the original subject line, which is  presumably why it
>> didn't get through most times.
>> Steve
>>  *******************************
>> Quoting Jeannie <jeannies@ns.sympatico.ca>:
>>> If this one goes through it will be the 3rd one I've sent.So if  
>>> you get multiples you will know why.
>>> Hi everyone,
>>> Here are a couple of photos.The first one is a photo of a moth  
>>> that my niece
>>> took and I pasted a pic of the cecropia moth that I had on the  
>>> photo.Now to
>>> me they look completely different.What I was wondering, is, are  they both
>>> cecropia moths and one is just a bit worn? Or are they completely  
>>> different
>>> species? The second is a photo of the cecropia that I had,(a close- up)
>>>
>>> http://outdoors.webshots.com/photo/2710463760025930195pIdCmK
>>>
>>> http://outdoors.webshots.com/photo/2917419830025930195IxTeCq
>>>
>>> Jeannie Shermerhorn,Port Hawkesbury
>>>
>>> Cottage....Cape George,Cape Breton
>>>
>>>
>>> jeannies@ns.sympatico.ca
>
> _._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._. _.
> Christopher Majka - Nova Scotia Museum of Natural History
> 1747 Summer Street, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada  B3H 3A6
> (902) 424-6435   Email <c.majka@ns.sympatico.ca>
> _._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._. _.
>

next message in archive
no next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects