next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects
Index of Subjects Hi Jean & All, Apr 26, 2007 It seems ironic that Daphne would have been removed from the Grand Pre Park of all places. I can think offhand of seven Daphne locations near Kentville and I have not noticed skeletons of man or beast near any of them. According to the 1976 Merck index, both Daphnin (the active principle in Mezereum; dried bark of several Daphne species including D. mezereum) and Warfarin are related to Coumarin but so is Umbelliferone. The LD-50 of Coumarin in rats is 680 mg/kg but no toxicity is given for either Daphnin or Warfarin (not even for rats !). Mezereum is classed by Merck as a vesicant (blister producer). Coumarin is classed as a Pharmaceutic aid (flavor); something to help the medicine go down. Umbelliferone is common in many plants including Daphne and is used in sunscreen lotions and creams. So being somewhat similar to Coumarin need not mean as toxic as Warfarin or toxic in the same way. I don't see anything to indicate that Daphnin or Mezereum has been used as a blood thinner. My Blumgarten (1906 Materia Medica) refers to external use as a liniment to produce redness and internally to treat syphilis. Yours truly, Dave Webster, Kentville Jean Timpa wrote: > All parts of the Daphne (a laurel) are deadly, but the berries are the >most tempting to consume, of course. Itwas brought over by the Acadians >as a medicinal as its active ingredient is the same as that of Warfarin, >needed in thinning blood -very carefully! but they knew how to do it-to >prevent strokes, clots, etc. > Grand Pre National Historic Site just down the road from us too >removed all their Daphne from their gardens because of its very poisonous >and libelous nature! I handled freshly emerged leaves on spring while >trying to harvest a sample for the Acadia Herbarium, and my fingers went >tingly where I had touched it for a few minutes. For a few minutes I >wondered how much damage I had done. It wasn't that painful, but certainly >worisome for a few minutes. > Pretty, but that does not make it safe, and I'd say it is best not to >have around except under professional survailance! JET > >
next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects