next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects
Index of Subjects
Hi Chris & All,
In addition, I think it is generally agreed that we are in an
interglacial period, i.e. still in an ice age. So we can count on
another glacial advance but can not have another ice age until the one
we are in has ended.
Of course this general agreement may have flipped back and forth
several times since I last read about it.
Yt, DW
c.majka@ns.sympatico.ca wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In reading this recall that it was published in 1974, 32 years ago and
> significantly before climatologists had the kind of information that
> they now do, which indicates anything but another ice age.
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> Chris
>
>
> On 20-Feb-07, at 5:35 PM, Lois Codling wrote:
>
>
>> For a different perspective on the global warming issue try:
>>
>> http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,944914,00.html
>>
>>
>> Lois Codling
>>
>
> _._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._.
>
> Christopher Majka - Nova Scotia Museum of Natural History
>
> 1747 Summer Street, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada B3H 3A6
>
> (902) 424-6435 Email < c.majka@ns.sympatico.ca
> <mailto:c.majka@ns.sympatico.ca> >
>
> _._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._.
>
>
next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects