Forestry Issues

Date: Thu, 24 Aug 00 09:51:20 -0400
From: Dan Earle & Sue Hutchins <chebogue@klis.com>
To: "Kevin Chisholm" <kchishol@fox.nstn.ca>
cc: <sust-mar@chebucto.ns.ca>
Precedence: bulk
Return-Path: <sust-mar-mml-owner@chebucto.ns.ca>

next message in archive
no next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects

Index of Subjects
>If there was a block of land of 200 acres, of uniform aged, overmature
>white spruce and fir, what would you suggest as a sensible alternative
>to a 200 acre clearcut?
>
>Kevin Chisholm

I would suggest that forest ecologists or other forest experts might have 
several different approaches for harvest. In any case, it would depend to 
some extent on the specific case and condtion of trees, the status of 
forest in terms of layers of vegetation from ground to crown, the 
topography and soils of the site, presence of streams or other 
waterbodies, and so on. In Nova Scotia we will seldom find a flat, fully 
uniform, and fully overmature tree stand unless it was a previous 
reforestation tree farm.

I agree that there are some pretty miserable tree stands that lack 
characteristics of a healthy forest such as diversity of size and species 
and layers of vegetation. We seem to have a lot of woodlands in early 
succession (by forest standards) as they grow back from former clearing. 
They do get to a stage where they are 'ripe for picking' for pulpwood. It 
is difficult to let them keep going to the next stage where a more mature 
forest might develop. Instead, they get cut down and we start over.

Perhaps we need to set areas aside for tree farms and areas aside to 
become forests. At least we would know which are which and clarify the 
debate on clearcut vs other forms of sustainable harvest. If someone 
grows a field of potatoes we expect it to be harvested. If someone grows 
a patch of trees for pulp we expect it to harvested. The conflict seems 
to be in areas where the industry sees all wooded lands as farm and 
others see all wooded land as forest. Additionally, the lack of concern 
for waterbodies, and recreational uses (portage destruction for example), 
and any vegetation values other than trees gets the industry in trouble 
with those interested in long-term and multiple use of wooded lands.

Dan Earle



-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-
The preceding message was posted on the Sustainable Maritimes
mailing list (sust-mar).  http://www.chebucto.ns.ca/lists/sust-mar
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-

Sponsors: Chebucto Community Net   	http://www.chebucto.ns.ca 
Sierra Club - Chebucto Group		http://www.sierraclub.ca
Volunteer moderator: Paul Falvo  mailto:sust-mar-owner@chebucto.ns.ca

To submit a message to sust-mar, please send it to:
mailto:sust-mar@chebucto.ns.ca

PLEASE SEND MESSAGES TO SUST-MAR IN PLAIN TEXT ONLY
MESSAGES CONTAINING HTML (MIME) CANNOT BE POSTED

next message in archive
no next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects