arrest environmentalists

Date: Fri, 30 Oct 1998 14:17:25 -0400 (AST)
From: "David M. Wimberly" <ag487@chebucto.ns.ca>
To: Sustainable-Maritimes <sust-mar@chebucto.ns.ca>
Precedence: bulk
Return-Path: <sust-mar-mml-owner@chebucto.ns.ca>

next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
Index of Subjects


The Daily News article below was written specially for the Daily News.  It
represents quite a threatening editorial bias made blatant.  This is
important news when we consider what news we get about the environment or
about social activism.

The blatant betrayal by the NS Liberal government (and by Halifax staff
and counselors) of the groups trying to control exposures from cosmetic
uses of pesticides is cut from the same mold. As well as many more
instances.

This article, and government actions, are not about eco-terrorism.  Rather
they about giving free rein to corporate and government terrorism against
protection and conservation of our ecological and social heritage.

It is time we wake up and stop being complacent. The longer we wait to
stop this, the harder it will be to stop.  And the more tragic damage will
have been done.


                               David Wimberly
                            ag487@chebucto.ns.ca
                  http://www.geocities.com/RainForest/6847/

**********************************************************************


       Friday, October 30, 1998
       Terrorists by any other name
       Environmentalists should be charged when they destroy property
       By Glenn Woiceshyn -- Special to The Daily News
       An underground environmental group called the Earth Liberation
       Front claimed responsibility for recently incinerating four ski
       lifts and three buildings worth $12 million US at Vail, Colorado.
       Vail's plans to expand its ski area apparently clashed with
       environmentalists' plans to re-populate the "endangered" lynx in
       Colorado. The liberation front destroyed the property "on behalf
       of the lynx," and warned skiers to ski elsewhere this winter.
       While mainstream environmental groups might try to distance
       themselves from the liberation front and its eco-terrorist
       methods, the truth is, the front did directly what mainstream
       environmentalists have been doing indirectly for years via the
       U.S. government's Endangered Spec-ies Act.
       Since becoming law in 1973, the act has been used in countless
       ways to inflict harm on people in the name of protecting
       endangered species and their habitats. The Northern Spotted Owl
       became famous when timber production was virtually halted in the
       Pacific Northwest to protect the species. In Oregon in 1992, the
       water regularly supplied to several farmers from the Klamath
       Irrigation Project near the Oregon-California border was cut off
       by government to protect the short-nose sucker and the Lost River
       sucker, causing severe damages to crops and livestock.
       
Farmer arrested for ploughing
       In California, construction was halted on the San Bernardino
       Medical Centre and, later, on a neighbouring subdivision to
       protect the Delhi Sands flower-loving fly. Near Bakersfield,
       Calif., a farmer was arrested in 1994 by fish and wildlife
       officers for inadvertently killing five Tipton kangaroo rats while
       plowing his own soil. His tractor and plow were seized as murder
       weapons. Under the act, he faced heavy fines and three years in
       prison.
       What motivates environmentalists to protect endangered species
       with so much zeal they are oblivious to the harm inflicted on
       people?
       The real motive behind environmentalism is stated by David Graber,
       a biologist with the U.S. National Park Service: "We are not
       interested in the utility of a particular species, or free-flowing
       river, or ecosystem to mankind. They have intrinsic value ...."
       This intrinsic-value philosophy means man must value nature - not
       for any benefit to man, but because nature is somehow a value in
       and of itself. Hence, nature must be kept pristine despite any
       harm caused to humans. We must halt activities beneficial to us,
       such as farming, forestry, cancer treatment, in order to safeguard
       fish, birds, trees and rats.
       Throughout history, people were told they must sacrifice their
       lives to God, the king, the proletariat, the nation, or the Fuhrer
       - all with deadly consequences. And environmental legislation
       provides government with massive powers to enforce such
       sacrifices.
       What disasters could such power lead to? Because governments are
       supposed to protect individual rights, not violate them, we should
       stop handing government the power to sacrifice people to nature,
       and demand it relinquish any such power it wields. (This is
       especially urgent given federal Environment Minister Christine
       Stewart - facing intense lobbying from environmentalists -
       recently announced plans to introduce endangered species
       legislation next spring.)
       
Governments lack will
       As for the eco-terrorists who destroy property and (in the case of
       the Unabomber) even harm or kill people, they would not be so
       brazen in committing terrorism were it not for the moral sanction
       they currently derive from the anti-human philosophy underlying
       environmentalism.
       Furthermore, governments stripped of its power to sacrifice people
       to nature would have more resources and resolve to track these
       criminals down and bring them to justice.

       Glenn Woiceshyn is a freelance writer, who lives in Calgary.
         _____________________________________________________________
       

next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
Index of Subjects