next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
Index of Subjects
The Daily News article below was written specially for the Daily News. It represents quite a threatening editorial bias made blatant. This is important news when we consider what news we get about the environment or about social activism. The blatant betrayal by the NS Liberal government (and by Halifax staff and counselors) of the groups trying to control exposures from cosmetic uses of pesticides is cut from the same mold. As well as many more instances. This article, and government actions, are not about eco-terrorism. Rather they about giving free rein to corporate and government terrorism against protection and conservation of our ecological and social heritage. It is time we wake up and stop being complacent. The longer we wait to stop this, the harder it will be to stop. And the more tragic damage will have been done. David Wimberly ag487@chebucto.ns.ca http://www.geocities.com/RainForest/6847/ ********************************************************************** Friday, October 30, 1998 Terrorists by any other name Environmentalists should be charged when they destroy property By Glenn Woiceshyn -- Special to The Daily News An underground environmental group called the Earth Liberation Front claimed responsibility for recently incinerating four ski lifts and three buildings worth $12 million US at Vail, Colorado. Vail's plans to expand its ski area apparently clashed with environmentalists' plans to re-populate the "endangered" lynx in Colorado. The liberation front destroyed the property "on behalf of the lynx," and warned skiers to ski elsewhere this winter. While mainstream environmental groups might try to distance themselves from the liberation front and its eco-terrorist methods, the truth is, the front did directly what mainstream environmentalists have been doing indirectly for years via the U.S. government's Endangered Spec-ies Act. Since becoming law in 1973, the act has been used in countless ways to inflict harm on people in the name of protecting endangered species and their habitats. The Northern Spotted Owl became famous when timber production was virtually halted in the Pacific Northwest to protect the species. In Oregon in 1992, the water regularly supplied to several farmers from the Klamath Irrigation Project near the Oregon-California border was cut off by government to protect the short-nose sucker and the Lost River sucker, causing severe damages to crops and livestock. Farmer arrested for ploughing In California, construction was halted on the San Bernardino Medical Centre and, later, on a neighbouring subdivision to protect the Delhi Sands flower-loving fly. Near Bakersfield, Calif., a farmer was arrested in 1994 by fish and wildlife officers for inadvertently killing five Tipton kangaroo rats while plowing his own soil. His tractor and plow were seized as murder weapons. Under the act, he faced heavy fines and three years in prison. What motivates environmentalists to protect endangered species with so much zeal they are oblivious to the harm inflicted on people? The real motive behind environmentalism is stated by David Graber, a biologist with the U.S. National Park Service: "We are not interested in the utility of a particular species, or free-flowing river, or ecosystem to mankind. They have intrinsic value ...." This intrinsic-value philosophy means man must value nature - not for any benefit to man, but because nature is somehow a value in and of itself. Hence, nature must be kept pristine despite any harm caused to humans. We must halt activities beneficial to us, such as farming, forestry, cancer treatment, in order to safeguard fish, birds, trees and rats. Throughout history, people were told they must sacrifice their lives to God, the king, the proletariat, the nation, or the Fuhrer - all with deadly consequences. And environmental legislation provides government with massive powers to enforce such sacrifices. What disasters could such power lead to? Because governments are supposed to protect individual rights, not violate them, we should stop handing government the power to sacrifice people to nature, and demand it relinquish any such power it wields. (This is especially urgent given federal Environment Minister Christine Stewart - facing intense lobbying from environmentalists - recently announced plans to introduce endangered species legislation next spring.) Governments lack will As for the eco-terrorists who destroy property and (in the case of the Unabomber) even harm or kill people, they would not be so brazen in committing terrorism were it not for the moral sanction they currently derive from the anti-human philosophy underlying environmentalism. Furthermore, governments stripped of its power to sacrifice people to nature would have more resources and resolve to track these criminals down and bring them to justice. Glenn Woiceshyn is a freelance writer, who lives in Calgary. _____________________________________________________________
next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
Index of Subjects