Tar ponds

Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1998 15:26:32 -0300 (ADT)
From: "David M. Wimberly" <ag487@chebucto.ns.ca>
To: Sustainable-Maritimes <sust-mar@chebucto.ns.ca>
Precedence: bulk
Return-Path: <sust-mar-mml-owner@chebucto.ns.ca>

next message in archive
no next message in thread
previous message in archive
Index of Subjects


          Sunday, July 26, 1998 	 The Halifax Herald Limited
                                      
Cleanup could cost billions

   By Paul Schneidereit / Staff Reporter SUNDAY EXTRA
   
   Sydney - Cleaning up what's called the largest toxic waste site in
   North America could take decades and cost billions.
   
   Until more is known, officials caution that those estimates are very
   crude, but no one will deny the final bill for cleaning up the Sydney
   tar ponds and former Sydney Steel coke ovens site could be immense.
   
   "To remediate to industrial standards, the best guesstimates, and
   these are very crude, are 20 to 25 years and in the order of hundreds
   of millions of dollars," says Mike Britten, program manager at Joint
   Action Group, the community-driven organization tasked with the
   cleanup.
   
   A Smithville, Ont., project to clean up half a hectare contaminated
   with transformer oil has already cost in excess of $50 million, he
   said.
   
   In comparison, the Sydney project involves 100 hectares and a chemical
   cocktail of toxic substances, including heavy metals, various
   hydrocarbons and PCBs.
   
   Mr. Britten agreed the cleanup could cost billions.
   
   "That's exactly right. Right now, nobody knows how much, how long,
   until the entire problem is defined."
   
   Don Ferguson, Health Canada's director general for the Atlantic
   region, says all estimates, including his, are guesses at this point.
   
   "When we talk about this site, we're talking at least half a billion
   dollars. And that's a very, very conservative estimate."
   
   For Eric Brophy, a 65-year-old resident of Whitney Pier and member of
   JAG's health studies working group, the final figure is irrelevant.
   
   "We demand whatever it takes to clean this up. No more nonsense.
   
   "We're no different than anybody else except we die at a faster rate.
   I don't care whether it's $2 billion or $3 billion. Do it."
   
   Studies have shown higher rates of cancer and heart disease in Cape
   Breton County and Sydney compared to the rest of Nova Scotia.
   
   An in-depth Health Canada study of disease mortality and incidence
   rates, to be released in late September, will reveal similar patterns,
   says Pierre Band, one of the scientists involved in the project.
   
   Meanwhile, results will also be released this year from a study into
   cancer incidence in Sydney done by Judy Guernsey, a Dalhousie
   University scientist. Her work was funded by the Electric Power
   Research Institute in California.
   
   What's really needed, Mr. Brophy said, is a study that tracks
   individuals who lived in Whitney Pier and what happened to them.
   
   Many residents who grew up in Sydney and moved away were affected, he
   said.
   
   "The bodies are coming home, we're burying them here," Mr. Brophy
   said. "We not only export our people. We also export our cancer."
   
   Then there's the thorny question of personal compensation.
   
   Many wonder whether studies will ever offer enough scientific proof
   that coke ovens and Sydney Steel emissions had a significant impact on
   people's health.
   
   "Does government want to come up with a smoking gun?" asked Mr.
   Brophy. "I personally believe that government is afraid of the
   compensation issue."
   
   But Mr. Ferguson said he has never seen any evidence of that at the
   federal level.
   
   "I think that that's obviously a question that governments will have
   to respond to" if it's raised, he said.
   
   Provincial officials could not be reached for comment.
   
   With a proper control group, studies should be able to determine if
   the environment contributed to higher rates of disease, Mr. Ferguson
   said.
   
   But no one will ever be able to prove exposure directly caused cancer
   in a person, he said.
   
   "Eventually, we will get to the point where some conclusions can be
   drawn," said Germaine Lemoine, JAG's public information officer.
   
   "If it's from the site, then compensation may be an issue. And if it
   isn't from the site, then the people of this community have to heal."
   
   Meanwhile, the coming months will see progress on a number of cleanup
   projects, Mr. Britten said.
   
   By early fall, work will begin on a $8.5-million sewer interceptor
   that will divert roughly three million gallons of raw sewage, now
   dumped daily into the tar ponds, directly into the harbor.
   
   The tar ponds are a tidal estuary, so sewage dumped there is already
   oceanbound, he said.
   
   Eventually, JAG officials say, a treatment plant will be built to
   handle sewage from a large area of the city.
   
   The sewer interceptor is part of the effort to stabilize the toxic
   waste site, which includes the tar ponds and coke ovens grounds.
   
   A report on the leachate flowing from a municipal dump above the coke
   ovens site is expected within a few weeks, Mr. Britten said.
   
   Members of JAG's environmental committee say a collection system will
   eventually be needed to stop the leachate from further contaminating
   the site.
     _________________________________________________________________

next message in archive
no next message in thread
previous message in archive
Index of Subjects