Washington Post: 'Organic' Label Ruled Out For Biotech, Irradiated Food

Date: Mon, 4 May 1998 13:38:13 -0300 (ADT)
From: "David M. Wimberly" <ag487@chebucto.ns.ca>
To: Sustainable-Maritimes <sust-mar@chebucto.ns.ca>
Precedence: bulk
Return-Path: <sust-mar-mml-owner@chebucto.ns.ca>

next message in archive
no next message in thread
previous message in archive
Index of Subjects


The following article in its entirety was published in the Washington
Post.  Ask me if you want the whole thing. Or visit the web site.
----------------------------------------------------------------------



http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/WPlate/1998-05/01/149l-050198-idx.html
Organic' Label Ruled Out For Biotech, Irradiated Food

              By Rick Weiss
              Washington Post Staff Writer
              Friday, May 1, 1998; Page A02

              Intense pressure and criticism from tens of
              thousands of citizens have pushed Agriculture
              Secretary Dan Glickman to decide that
              genetically engineered and irradiated food,
              and crops fertilized with sewage sludge, should
              not be allowed to be labeled "organic,"
              according to an administration official.

              That decision, still not formalized but
              described by the official as all but inevitable,
              would remove three of the more contentious
              issues threatening to derail an effort to codify
              for the first time a federal definition of organic
              food.

              But several other elements of the USDA
              proposal remain controversial, including the
              rule's relatively liberal allowance for the use of
              antibiotics, nonorganic feed and long-term
              confinement of animals in the production of
              organic meat.

              An estimated 150,000 people flooded the
              Agriculture Department with cards and letters
              during the four-month comment period on the
              proposal that ended yesterday -- more
              comments than the department had ever
              received on any single rule.

              The proposed rule had left open the question
              of whether gene-modified, irradiated or
              sludge-fertilized crops could be deemed
              organic. The vast majority of comments
              opposed those ideas. Moreover, most were
              personal and passionate, as opposed to
              mass-produced form letters from interest
              groups -- an indication of the American
              public's increasingly fervent hunger for
              "natural" foods.

              Glickman said he could not comment
              specifically on how the department would
              respond to what he called the "extraordinary"
              wave of public opinion generated by the
              proposed rule, but he did promise "significant
              modifications" in a final rule that he hoped
              would be approved by the end of this year
              after allowing for additional comments.

              Sligh and others representing the organic food
              industry said they were especially troubled by
              a provision in the proposed rule that gives the
              agriculture secretary authority to add products
              to a national list of approved organic foods.
              Organic industry advocates argue that
              Congress granted those powers only to the
              National Organic Standards Board.

              If Glickman insists on retaining that authority
              in a final rule, advocates said, a lawsuit is
              likely to follow.

                  © Copyright 1998 The Washington Post
                                Company

----------------------------------------------------------------------

next message in archive
no next message in thread
previous message in archive
Index of Subjects