next message in archive
no next message in thread
previous message in archive
Index of Subjects
The following article in its entirety was published in the Washington Post. Ask me if you want the whole thing. Or visit the web site. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/WPlate/1998-05/01/149l-050198-idx.html Organic' Label Ruled Out For Biotech, Irradiated Food By Rick Weiss Washington Post Staff Writer Friday, May 1, 1998; Page A02 Intense pressure and criticism from tens of thousands of citizens have pushed Agriculture Secretary Dan Glickman to decide that genetically engineered and irradiated food, and crops fertilized with sewage sludge, should not be allowed to be labeled "organic," according to an administration official. That decision, still not formalized but described by the official as all but inevitable, would remove three of the more contentious issues threatening to derail an effort to codify for the first time a federal definition of organic food. But several other elements of the USDA proposal remain controversial, including the rule's relatively liberal allowance for the use of antibiotics, nonorganic feed and long-term confinement of animals in the production of organic meat. An estimated 150,000 people flooded the Agriculture Department with cards and letters during the four-month comment period on the proposal that ended yesterday -- more comments than the department had ever received on any single rule. The proposed rule had left open the question of whether gene-modified, irradiated or sludge-fertilized crops could be deemed organic. The vast majority of comments opposed those ideas. Moreover, most were personal and passionate, as opposed to mass-produced form letters from interest groups -- an indication of the American public's increasingly fervent hunger for "natural" foods. Glickman said he could not comment specifically on how the department would respond to what he called the "extraordinary" wave of public opinion generated by the proposed rule, but he did promise "significant modifications" in a final rule that he hoped would be approved by the end of this year after allowing for additional comments. Sligh and others representing the organic food industry said they were especially troubled by a provision in the proposed rule that gives the agriculture secretary authority to add products to a national list of approved organic foods. Organic industry advocates argue that Congress granted those powers only to the National Organic Standards Board. If Glickman insists on retaining that authority in a final rule, advocates said, a lawsuit is likely to follow. © Copyright 1998 The Washington Post Company ----------------------------------------------------------------------
next message in archive
no next message in thread
previous message in archive
Index of Subjects