NSCES Questions list

Date: Sun, 15 Mar 1998 01:14:17 -0400 (AST)
From: "David M. Wimberly" <ag487@chebucto.ns.ca>
To: Sustainable-Maritimes <sust-mar@chebucto.ns.ca>
Return-Path: <sust-mar-owner@chebucto.ns.ca>

next message in archive
no next message in thread
previous message in archive
Index of Subjects


Hi,
The questions below were sent to all three NS political parties. It was 
composed collaboratively with the groups that are members of the NSCES.

I believe that you can make good use of this by forwarding it to your 
local candidates and requesting they fill it out and return it both to 
you and to me (for the Coalition) and that they encourage one to be 
filled out on behalf of the party as a whole and 
returned to me at ag487@chebucto.ns.ca	

To persons with environmental illness/multiple chemical sensitivity these 
issues are literally life & death, sickness and health.

I suggests that you will find this a good way to get a better idea about 
how to vote.

Please contact me if you have questions.


                                   David Wimberly
                                ag487@chebucto.ns.ca
                                Halifax, Nova Scotia
                     http://www.geocities.com/RainForest/6847/

               "Flectere si nequeo superos, Acheronta movebo" Virgil
                  (If heaven I cannot bend, then hell I'll stir.)       

@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@


Nova Scotia Coalition on Environmental Sensitivity
6095 Coburg Rd., Apt. 905
Halifax, Nova Scotia  B3H 4K1
429-6309,  fax:  429-2308
March 13, 1998


Attention:
Premier Russell MacLellan and Liberal party candidates			
MLA Robert Chisholm and New Democratic party candidates		
MLA John Hamm and Conservative party candidates			


Dear Nova Scotia party leaders and party candidates:

All three political parties have publicly made a commitment to improving 
Nova Scotia's health care and they have made it a leading priority in 
this election. To us, the important questions are: exactly how and when. 
For example, focusing on expensive high-tech equipment may divert 
attention and scarce resources from where help can be most effective, 
namely basic care, prevention, and education.  Clean air, clean food and 
clean water are the foundations of improved health for the vast majority 
of those affected by Environmental Illness/Multiple Chemical Sensitivity 
(EI/MCS).

In the field of EI/MCS we have particularly observed erosion of basic 
services and support such as comprehensive education, effective 
prevention, and availability and variety of treatments. Three to five 
percent of the population are strongly affected and thirty percent or 
more are somewhat affected by EI/MCS and the numbers keep increasing.  
Surely you know of friends, colleagues, and neighbours who are affected.  
Decisive action must be taken to halt the increase of this illness and to 
provide help for those already ill.

This questionnaire is being submitted so we can provide information to 
the people of NS to allow them to judge the specifics of your generalized 
promises to improve NS health care. 

Our request is for an answer we can release from each party leader and 
each party as a whole.  But we also request that you distribute this 
questionnaire to each of your candidates so they can all become more 
familiar with our issues, questions and needs.  We also welcome their 
individual replies.

Please answer our questions with a yes or no and add any comments you 
wish in the space afterwards.  We will release the results of this 
questionnaire on Thursday, March 19, 1998.  So please, we must have your 
written response no later than noon on Wednesday March 18.  

The specifics of your answer matter a great deal to us in our preparation 
for the election.

Please respond via fax to 429-2308 or e-mail to ag487@chebucto.ns.ca.  

Thank you.



QUESTIONS:


1.	HOME CARE.	
Home care proposals have not included those with Environmental 
Illness/Multiple Chemical Sensitivity.  Home care is frequently the best 
and most appropriate care available for people with EI/MCS.  Many medical 
costs to both the patient and MSI would be avoided and much hardship 
could be alleviated with home care appropriate to EI/MCS.

If elected, will you pledge to extend effective home care to those with 
EI/MCS within three months or during the first sitting of the 
legislature?  		      	      Yes ________             No_________
Comments? ___________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________


2.	INDOOR AIR QUALITY REGULATION  
Since the Westray tragedy in May 1992, the last two governments committed 
themselves to undertaking a comprehensive review of occupational health 
and safety in this province. In particular, this review focussed on 
needed changes to existing occupational health and safety legislation 
including the possibility of a new regulation on indoor air quality in 
non-industrial workplaces. After two years of intense efforts, the joint 
labour-management Working Group on Indoor Air Quality is close to 
finalizing this new regulation. However, the Department of Labour has yet 
to convene a meeting of the Working Group since October ro review a 
completely revised version of the regulation. 
	For people with environmental sensitivities, the passing of this 
new regulation is especially urgent. It could greatly help to prevent 
them from being exposed to environmental stressors that adversely affect 
their health.  These regulations would also help prevent others from 
becoming environmentally sensitive.

Would your party as government commit to finalizing and implementing an 
indoor air quality regulation based on the efforts of the Working Group, 
and to providing adequate resources for public education and enforcement 
related to this regulation, within a year of taking office?
					Yes ________             No_________
Comments? ___________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________


3.	SCHOOLS:  Products and Practices
Products, practices and the condition of school buildings all impact on 
School children's health and ability to learn. School boards are 
responsible to provide a safe learning environment so that children can 
learn effectively and maintain their health and well being.  With the 
help of several government departments
progress is being made, but there is still much to be done. Many schools 
with significant Indoor Air Quality problems were not identified by the 
school boards in the recent Capital Construction Project.

Will your government take immediate and continuous action to ensure all 
school boards identify and correct any further school Indoor Air Quality 
problems?   						Yes_______ No_______
Comments? ___________________________________________________________________

Will your government also take the financial steps necessary to ensure 
that ALL of the province's school children spend their days in healthy 
buildings?  						Yes_______   No______
Action Plan:_________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________

                        
4.	PESTICIDES
By this time of year, most of us are looking forward with great 
anticipation to the warmth, light, and new growth of the spring and 
summer months.  However, for some it is an anticipation tinged with 
dread, the time of pesticide spraying and other chemical treatment of 
lawns.  We are all at risk from the effects of these chemicals, but for 
some even minute exposure from the drift of these toxic chemicals is 
life-threatening.  Evacuation for 3-7 days, whether planned or 
unpredictable, many times in a summer should not be part of anyone's 
normal life.  Children should be safe from toxic chemical exposure as 
they walk to and from school.  Will your party take steps to insure that 
we and our children are protected from these dangerous and poorly 
regulated chemicals, and will your party take steps to protect the most 
vulnerable so that they can be safe in their own homes?
					Yes ________             No_________
Comments? ___________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________


5.	SABLE GAS		
In the largest clinical study of Environmental Illness/Multiple Chemical 
Sensitivity ever (of 47,000 patients), natural gas was "the most 
important source of indoor air pollution responsible for generating 
illness." Outdoor uses such as generating electricity do not harm those 
with EI/MCS, but all uses indoors in buildings people inhabit will cause 
harm.  Mere ventilation has proven ineffective due to the inevitable 
permeation of buildings and entire neighbourhoods by this extremely 
volatile natural gas, its contaminants, its toxic additives, and its 
inevitable by-products of combustion.  This is an extremely important 
property of natural gas use that has been ignored or suppressed outside 
the community of doctors and patients with EI/MCS.  A great deal of harm 
and cost can be avoided by giving careful attention to this fact now.

With the impending development of the Sable gas reserves, will you as our 
future legislators undertake to keep natural gas service out of our 
neighbourhoods where people live, such as homes, schools, hospitals and 
libraries, and public venues such as offices, malls, theatres and grocery 
stores, in order to protect those who are already chemically sensitive 
and to protect others from becoming sensitive to this gas?	
					      Yes ________        No_______
Comments? ___________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________


6.	PARTNERING/CONSENSUS BUILDING
Patients and Nova Scotia Environmental Health Centre staff have been 
meeting to discuss a Partnering
and Consensus Building process to explore ways to resolve the many issues 
and opportunities in providing comprehensive and effective treatment, 
education, protection and research in this field for the benefit of Nova 
Scotian citizens.  To be effective, this process requires the 
wholehearted participation and commitment of all stakeholders, including 
the provincial government.

If elected, will you pledge an empowered representative to this 
partnering/consensus building process?  
					Yes ________             No_________
Comments? ___________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
	

7.	WAITING LIST
Given that many hundreds, if not thousands, of Nova Scotians are 
suffering from and sometimes incapacitated by Environmental Illness; and 
many have been on the waiting list for the NSEHC for years with little 
chance of ever being treated; and these people have been forced to spend 
thousands of dollars on treatments; what will your government do to 
ensure access to appropriate, effective affordable treatment for these 
people? 
____________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________

Will your government take steps to ensure that the treatments for 
Environmental Illness are covered by MSI, as are treatments for cancer, 
diabetes, pneumonia, broken limbs, etc.?   
					Yes ________             No_________
Comments? ___________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________


8.	CONTRACT MANDATE FOR NS ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH CLINIC	
A NS Department of Health White Paper of 1992 outlines the three armed 
mandate of treatment, education and research for the NSEHC. The 
subsequent contract for the NSEHC was kept secret from interested 
parties, namely patients, potential patients, family physicians and the 
public.  Only through the Freedom of Information Act, have we recently 
obtained a copy of this contract and confirmed our suspicions that the 
NSEHC is specifically mandated for research only.  This directly 
contravenes the Dept. of Health's own recommendation in the White Paper.  
As a consequence, there are numerous concerns from many quarters 
including from many patients whose needs are no longer being met.  
Patients have been cut off from previously successful treatments.  Over 
1200 people on the waiting list face a 4 -or more- year waiting list to 
be seen.  After years on the waiting list, some have been told they will 
never be seen even although they suffer daily from environmental illness.

Will your party, if it comes to power, restore the NSEHC's three armed 
mandate 1) to provide Standard Medical Environmental Illness treatments, 
2) to provide comprehensive public and individual education, and 
3) to perform clinical research?		      	      	
					Yes ________             No_________
Comments? ___________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________


9.	LANGLEY REPORT
The Report of the Advisory Committee on Environmental Hypersensitivity 
submitted to the Deputy Minister of Health, June 24,1997, has been made 
public and circulated.  There have been tremendous criticisms about the 
Report, especially about the "Clinical Guidelines for the Management of 
Environmental Hypersensitivity for NS Physicians." These guidelines are 
utterly inadequate, a violation of the Hippocratic Oath  for Physicians, 
and potentially very dangerous for people with environmental illness.

Should your political party  be elected would you ensure that the Langley 
Report is rejected, including the conclusions and recommendations, and a 
new set of guidelines on environmental illness for NS Physicians be 
prepared consistent with the American Association of Environmental 
Medicine Treatments, and that these be distributed within the three month 
period after your election?  
					Yes ________             No_________
Comments? ___________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________


10.	BERESFORD REPORT
The Report on Environmental Hypersensitivity in Response to the Report of 
the Advisory Committee to the Minister of Health, January 5,1998, 
submitted by Dr Patricia Beresford has been made public and circulated. 
This is an excellent, comprehensive and accurate report of benefit to 
those with, or at risk of, environmental illness.

Should your political party be elected would you study and adopt the Dr. 
Beresford Report and begin to implement its recommendations within the 
three month period after your election?
					Yes ________             No_________
Comments? ___________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
 

11.	CAMP HILL HOSPITAL REPORT
The Report of the Evaluation of the Camp Hill Hospital Staff Affected by 
the Veterans Memorial Building Syndrome was prepared for the Department 
of Health jointly by the Nova Scotia Environmental Medicine Clinic and 
the Environmental Health Center-Dallas, Texas, in May, 1993.  This 
document was never released or implemented, consequently many victims of 
the Camp Hill Hospital Incident have not received the recommended treatments.

Should your political party be elected would you ensure that this Report 
is immediately made public and quickly implemented?		
						Yes ______       No______
Comments? ___________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________



Please answer our questions with a yes or no and add any comments you 
wish in the space afterwards.  We will release the results of this 
questionnaire on Thursday, March 19, 1998.  So please, we must have your 
written response no later than noon on Wednesday March 18.  

The specifics of your answer matter a great deal to us in our preparation 
for the election.
Please respond via fax to 429-2308 or e-mail to ag487@chebucto.ns.ca.  

Thank you.



next message in archive
no next message in thread
previous message in archive
Index of Subjects