Page Templates

Date: Sat, 13 May 2000 23:01:52 -0300 (ADT)
From: Michael Smith <michael@csuite.ns.ca>
To: Christopher Majka <nextug@is.dal.ca>
Cc: CCN Editors <editors@chebucto.ns.ca>, CCN Technical Committee <ccn-tech@chebucto.ns.ca>
Precedence: bulk
Return-Path: <editors-mml-owner@chebucto.ns.ca>

next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects

Index of Subjects
On Fri, 12 May 2000, Christopher Majka wrote:

> 2) A more problematic deprecated tag is <font></font> since HTML 4.0
> reccommends that character formatting all be spun out of HTML documents
> and into Cascading Style Sheets. Since we're not ready to do this yet
> here, I think we need to tolerate <font></font>.

CSS is something we might want to make use of soon, although it will add
another level of templatism :)

> 3) Not that I think it makes that much difference but should <IMG> links
> to images refer to /Icons (the actual name of the directory) rather than
> /icons the symbolic link?

I liked the lower case 'i' better at the time. It makes no difference. ;)
I'll probably change it next time I edit those files.

> Michael: what are your thoughts? I hope that replacing <center> with <p
> align="center"> will not pose any problems?

I think someone else pointed out that it won't work in all browsers,
although I can't think of any that don't support <p align="center">.

next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects