next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects
Index of Subjects It never occurred to me that editing access to 'editors' and 'motd' were part of the same edit group, since there is no direct correlation in the composition of the two groups. Overlap, since several people wear more than one CCN 'hat', but separate tasks. I suspect if my "on again/off again" access to editing the motd over the last few years may have been compounded by the overlap of the two lists, now quite distinct. I am delighted to hear that we now have a stable solution, and that nothing can possibly go wrong ever again. Can I get that in writing? --- Clive On Mon, 19 Apr 1999, Christopher Majka wrote: > Hi David! > > On Mon, 19 Apr 1999, David L. Potter wrote: > > > I've resurected the old motd group that was in disuse. It's now a subgroup > > of fn-edit (just to provide some ownership and I've added everyone that > > looked like they might have an interest in editing the motd. > > Wow: faster than a speeding electron! No sooner do I reply to your > suggestion then it's done! Thanks for dusting off the old motd group and > setting this up. > > Cheers! > > Chris > > _._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._. > Christopher Majka <aa051@chebucto.ns.ca> > Editor-in-Chief: Chebucto Community Net - Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada > URL = http://www.chebucto.ns.ca/Home.html > > "We have ... in this country ... far too many captive editors who cannot > even be heard to rattle their chains." -- Carl E. Lindstrom > _._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._. > >
next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects