next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects
Index of Subjects I've resurected the old motd group that was in disuse. It's now a subgroup of fn-edit (just to provide some ownership and I've added everyone that looked like they might have an interest in editing the motd. david potter On Mon, 19 Apr 1999, Christopher Majka wrote: > Hi David! > > On Sun, 18 Apr 1999, David L. Potter wrote: > > > Hi Clive... we use the same edit group for editors (fn-edit) and the motd. > > For the moment I've restored you to the fn-edit group. Maybe we need sn > > fn-motd group ...;-( > > I think this is a good idea since the editors and motd people are largely > not an overlapping group. Can you create a motd edit group, add the motd > people to it and then assign the motd file(s) (is there a seperate french > one?) to it? This would eliminate confusion and keep things clear. > > Thanks for the good suggestion! > > Chris > > _._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._. > Christopher Majka <aa051@chebucto.ns.ca> > Editor-in-Chief: Chebucto Community Net - Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada > URL = http://www.chebucto.ns.ca/Home.html > > "We have ... in this country ... far too many captive editors who cannot > even be heard to rattle their chains." -- Carl E. Lindstrom > _._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._.._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._. > >
next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects