Vendor Domaine Name Fees -Reply

From: aa935@chebucto.ns.ca
To: George White <aa056@chebucto.ns.ca>, Doug McCann <mccannd@gov.ns.ca>, Mark@chebucto.ns.ca, ccn-board@chebucto.ns.ca, ccn-ip@chebucto.ns.ca
References: <Pine.GSO.3.95.iB1.0.990526215350.11972A-100000@halifax.chebucto.ns.ca>
Date: Mon, 31 May 1999 23:30:56 -0300
Precedence: bulk
Return-Path: <ccn-ip-mml-owner@chebucto.ns.ca>

next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects

Index of Subjects
Quoting George White <aa056@chebucto.ns.ca>:

> On Tue, 25 May 1999, Doug McCann wrote:
> 
> > Sustainability is the next issue.  Through voluntarism, corporate and
> > personal generosity we can offer services to those who cannot afford the
> > basic fee.  If donations are greater than the shortfall from those in
> > financial need, then the organisation will flourish.  If not, we must
> > provide a mechanism to offset the shortfall.  This could be a 'built-in
> > donation' or an implicit fee related to the value of voluntarism. 
>  
> The problem with coercing people into 'volunteering' is that you don't
> always get good skill levels or work products.  Many organizations that
> rely on volunteers actually spend a very large part of their resources
> overseeing the work of volunteers.  CCN needs to maintain professional
> levels of operation, and many of the tasks require some knowlege and 
> skill.  

Volunteering should not be coerced.  But volunteerism can be valuated. Knowing 
the value of volunteered time can provide a basis for developing and/or 
justifying service fees.  When a member or IP seeks rationalization for a 
service fee, then one can point to the value of labour services being provided. 

However, we would never want to get in a situation where we associate the value 
of volunteer hours with a payment for services received. We don't associate 
cash donations with services provided.

> 
> This sounds like quite a lot of work to set up and administer.  A simple
> fee structure means more volunteer effort can go to running the things
> that affect users directly -- how many volunteers like doing financial
> administration?
> 
The discussion on fees has been raised because some of our members cannot 
justify the current fee schedule to current and potential IPs.  A flat fee of 
$200 or $400 is not defensible to many. While larger IP organizations can 
easily absorb the cost, the vast majority of our IP base or small, non-profits 
like ourselves.  

A fee structure that lists and valuates the services provided allows the IP to 
select the services required. Unlimited disk space may be of no consequence to 
a small organization. They may be satisfied with 1gb. A VDN may be of 
substantial value to a small firm, but how can one justify to $200 levy. One 
possibilty is through the 'cost' of other services provided.

Doug M



--------------------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through Chebucto IMP: http://IMP.Chebucto.NS.Ca

next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects