CCN future, direction, objectives

Date: Sat, 13 Feb 1999 13:14:04 -0400
From: Mark Rushton <Mark@chebucto.ns.ca>
To: ccn-board@chebucto.ns.ca, ccn-comm@chebucto.ns.ca
Cc: ccn-ip@chebucto.ns.ca
Precedence: bulk
Return-Path: <ccn-ip-mml-owner@chebucto.ns.ca>

next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
Index of Subjects


Okay, Sue -- you started it, so here's my $0.02 worth...

	Apologies in advance for Toes Stepped Upon, Noses Placed 
Out-Of-Joint, and Egos Bruised.  This is all coming from the 
perspective of an active member / IP / IPE.

I've been involved with the Comms Cttee, the IP Cttee, and currently 
am editor for Community Support & Development (just to 
contextualize).  I've done internet training for NGOs in Halifax, 
Cuba, and have seen from near and afar how the larger ISPs are taking 
"business" away from CCN, other Community Nets and even Web Networks 
(the Canadian NGO "community net").

Some time ago I sent out a note asking about the origins of the 
Phoenix WWW-based email service, looking for the rationale, the 
decision-making process etc.  No reply. (it went out to:  Michael , 
David M., Andrew W., ccn-comm, and ccn-tech).

This dovetails into other questions for which answers don't seem to 
be available.  I've just attempted to check out the Board's 
Minutes.... Am I the only one interested in reading them?  The last 
Board Minutes linked are for September 17 / 98, and the link still 
doesn't work (I've reported this numerous times...). - ah, actually, 
it's all links from Sept. - onward.  Has there been a board meeting 
in 1999 yet?

Page:  http://chebucto.ns.ca/Chebucto/FinAdmin/Board-Minutes/index.html

FYI, the broken link is a missing quotation mark on the HREF link for 
Sept.17th (Why does the link text say Sept. 2nd?)

I also see that the "Current Action Plan" is "under construction". 
What is CCN's Action Plan?

What is the vision for CCN's future?

PPP access -- great idea, if the technical requirements don't 
adversely affect system performance.  As an IP I am very interested 
in obtaining this service for the benefit of my organization.

VDNs - A wonderful service, if we can be clear on the $$$$. 
$400/year for IPs?  Ridiculous!  It would make more sense to me if 
"IP" were replaced with "Business" for the IP w/VDN, IP w/ basic 
Package and IP w/ Network Package categories.  But does anyone on the 
board seriously think that the IPs we currently have can afford that 
cost?  I'm _trying_ to convince the executive of the IP I represent 
to contribute the $200 fee for just being an IP.  It's not an easy 
task when organizations that serve the community have programming or 
other things on which to spend their dwindling $$$.  While the VDN 
would be a great boost to our accessibility (I would love to hand out 
www.nscuba.org rather than the current URL!), there's no way we can 
cover that cost.

If it's a money-maker, it has to be for commercial clients, because 
Community Orgs dont' have that kind of cash.  Have we surveyed our 
IPs to see what they feel they'd be able to pay?  Again - what is the 
rationale?  A one-time setup fee of $400 to cover the technical / 
time costs of creating a VDN I can grasp - but after the setup, what 
costs does CCN incur?  A $400 setup, and $70/annual to InterNic seems 
much more logical and realistic, from _my_ perspective.

And, might I add, the perspective of the IP Committee, which is most 
certainly NOT inactive, despite the inference of some....

I see CCN as facilitating the provision of Community-org information 
online.  That is what (hopefully) attracts visitors to our site: our 
_content_.  As much as we must fulfil the mandate of being an access 
resource for low-tech, low-income communty members/organizations, we 
must also be a destination of choice, developed via the provision of 
content.  I see that as an action item: generating content, boosting 
membership / IPs, and forgoeing some of the bells and whistles (see 
next item).

WWW-based email - Again, I'm hoping to see some rationale on this 
one.  I can't imagine why anyone would want it from CCN, when 
Hotmail, Canada.com, and a billion other sites are offering this (and 
where Hotmail has such a huge mental presence already).  I would 
suggest (again, without knowing how the decision to go this route was 
reached) that our great tech / design people could put their efforts 
into something a bit more relevant to CCN's survival.

As Sue's notes from other Community Nets have shown, PPP access at 
low/no-cost from commercial ISPs are threatening the viability of 
organizations like ours.    It would seem to me that a priority that 
has lagged in recent years is the focus on generating community 
content, helping CCN be the online "mirror" of the community it 
serves.

As an IPE, I feel frustrated at Chebucto's almost nonexistent public 
image.  What P.R. tools do we have?  Brochures?  Pamphlets?  What's 
our method for reaching out to the community that sees Sympatico as 
the only onramp worth looking at?

Lastly, to beat the sun-bleached bones of a dead horse, what is 
happening with the years-old issue of redesigning CCN's web-presence? 
That home page has been talked about since I returned to Canada in 
1996 - Three years on, not much has changed.  I see from the Board 
Minutes in September that a "new" or "revamped" CCN logo was 
approved.  Has anyone seen it?

Enough bloody talk.  It's time for action.  Let's move forward to 
revitalize Chebucto as a presence in the community and online. 
What, do we need a Glee Club or something?

I'm full of questions, I have some suggestions, but I'll hold those 
back until all of you have weighed in on this.

Respectfully,
Mark Rushton.
________________________________________________________________
Mark Rushton, Editor, Community Support & Development, Chebucto 
Community Network
Mark@chebucto.ns.ca     or via WWW:  http://chebucto.ns.ca/~Mark/index.html
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
Index of Subjects