next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects
Index of Subjects
Is there any evidence that id= is not widely supported? I was under the
impression that it was the preferred method (I certainly *much* prefer
it). I admit that I am relatively ignorant in this area.
On Fri, 16 May 1997, James Fifield wrote:
> > >
> > > No, it's not french that's broken. The tag "<h2 id=unpack>" is new and
> > > surprised me:
> >
> > I think we should avoid syntax that is non-standard where possible,
> > bearing in mind also that HTML+ and HTML3.0 died without approval, even if
> > Lynx supports it. The equivalent accepted syntax <a name=
> > works perfectly well for this purpose.
> >
> > Of course there are functions which will always be Lynx-specific, but that
> > does not need to be one of them.
> >
> > Besides, we do not need to lead new sites to use stuff that is not widely
> > supported, thus breaking (for some browsers) pages that they write, using
> > our pages as models. It's not good user support.
> >
> > Ed Dyer aa146@chebucto.ns.ca (902) H 826-7496 CCN Assistant Postmaster
>
> I've converted build.html.fr to use <a name="name"> tag's instead of the
> id="name", if we want to change it back later we can but this is more consistant
> I think, (it's what the english version uses).
>
> --
> James Fifield
> <fifield@ug.cs.dal.ca>
>
>
David Trueman,
Systems Manager, Dalhousie Math, Stats and Computing Science
Technical Chair, Chebucto Community Net
next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects