next message in archive
no next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects
Index of Subjects As technical liaison to the IP committee, I have some proposed changes to the zip / unzip functions which I will either bring up at the next meeting or by e-mail in the next day or two... Please let me know any concerns with these functions as seen by this audience. What behaviour would you expect in this particular case? (zip -m perhaps, which zips and deletes (like gzip) and should be used with the test option?) +Ed On Fri, 6 Dec 1996, David John Murdoch wrote: > Date: Fri, 6 Dec 1996 08:38:26 -0400 > From: David John Murdoch <djm@duncan.alt.ns.ca> > To: CSuite Testing Reports <csuite-tech@chebucto.ns.ca> > Subject: landon: File Browser > > The file browser works well! > > Just a small point. Option [9] to compress using zip creates a new > zip file.zip alongside the file that has been zipped. > Profile.save.html > Profile.save.html.zip > This might present a problem to users who keep seeing that the > zip extension still exists. > -- > David Murdoch djm@duncan.alt.ns.ca Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada > <"http://www.chebucto.ns.ca/~djm">DJM</a> > > > Ed Dyer aa146@chebucto.ns.ca (902) H 826-7496 CCN Assistant Postmaster http://www.chebucto.ns.ca/~aa146/ W 426-4894 CSuite Technical Workshop Religion Page Editor, Chebucto Community Network http://www.chebucto.ns.ca
next message in archive
no next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects