New Search Engine

References:
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2000 16:28:05 -0700
To: "David L. Potter" <potter@chebucto.ns.ca>, csuite-dev@chebucto.ns.ca
From: Gareth Shearman <shearman@victoria.tc.ca>
Cc: ccn-tech@chebucto.ns.ca
Precedence: bulk
Return-Path: <csuite-dev-mml-owner@chebucto.ns.ca>

next message in archive
no next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects

Index of Subjects
Interesting - in fact, how to improve on searches so that they pay 
more attention to community has been a topic of discussion here in 
Victoria.



At 11:02 PM -0300 6/1/00, David L. Potter wrote:
>On Thu, 1 Jun 2000, Jeff Warnica wrote:
>
>>
>>  > I see two (or three) distinct functions/software entities...
>>  >
>>  > 1) the locating (1a) classification of documents, and
>>
>>  1a) is something that will only be able to be performed by people. AI is
>>  nowhere near the contextual critical mass to automate this.
>
>I'm pretty sure Industry Canada has funded some promising work in this
>area... (document classification)...
>
>>  >
>>  > With respect to CSuite it should honour the convention of indexing
>>  > UpperCase Directories and ignoring lowercase directories...
>>
>>  This is fine, but only if we plan on ignoring the other 99.9% of the web.
>
>You're missing the point... it should be capable of doing this for _our_
>CSuite sites...
>
>>
>>  (big snip)
>>
>>  Your making the assumption that the 'indexer' in crawler/indexer/searcher
>>  has something to do with making human readable indexes. It dosent. And
>>  nothing that exists (outside Ft. Mead) is capable of doing that.
>
>I don't think that I'm making that assumption at all... I'm offering a
>'wish list' of functionality... how, if ever, that functionality is
>expressed is something else again but I do know that there is work being
>done in these areas that might address these wishes...
>
>dlp

next message in archive
no next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects