restricting guest accounts to reading local webpages

From: jnemeth@victoria.tc.ca (John Nemeth)
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2000 20:25:39 -0800
To: Edward Dyer <aa146@chebucto.ns.ca>
Cc: csuite-dev@chebucto.ns.ca
Precedence: bulk
Return-Path: <csuite-dev-mml-owner@chebucto.ns.ca>

next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects

Index of Subjects
On Jun 19,  1:49am, Edward Dyer wrote:
} On Fri, 3 Mar 2000, John Nemeth wrote:
} 
} >      I would like to get a general consensus on whether people think it
} > would be a good idea to restrict guest accounts to only reading
} > webpages on the local machine.  We have done this in Victoria.  The
} > reason for doing this is to encourage people to register for accounts
} > as opposed to just logging in as guests all the time.  What does
} > everybody think?
} 
} I think it's a great idea, provided that you have about 10,000
} information providers on your site that users can browse.  Otherwise

     I don't think that is necessary.  The idea of the guest account is
to give people a taste of what they can get with the community network;
not to give them completely free, unlimited, unrestricted,
unauthenticated access to the internet.

} I think the guest users are going to find it so restrictive that
} most will go away very dissatisfied.  That's very _unlikely_ to
} encourage them to join, IMHO.

     As I noted, we implemented this policy in Victoria a long time
ago, with satisfactory results.  I'm not saying that every site will be
the same, just that we do have some empirical data.

}-- End of excerpt from Edward Dyer

next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects