next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects
Index of Subjects Daryle Niedermayer wrote: > On Mon, 30 Nov 1998, Peter Morgan wrote: > > > I think both some sort of "instant activation" and "access everywhere" > > capability is really important. > > It may be a matter of semantics but I would caution against the "instant > activation" option. I for one am very tired of being spammed by a hotmail > account, write the abuse@hotmail address to complain, have the account > shut down and then get the same spam from another account a couple of days > later. This is a real problem. Could this be addressed by having the Community Hotmail require sender identification, as is done by community nets? Colin W. > > > If there is one aspect of community networking that I affirm, it is that > users are people and cannot hide behind the anonymity of their actions > (just like a real community). We require users to share some form of ID > before getting a user account--even if it is only a voided cheque blank. > In this way they can't use their account inappropriately and absolve > themselves of the consequences by simply picking a new on-line persona. > > -- > Daryle Niedermayer > > President > Great Plains Free-Net Inc. > http://www.gpfn.sk.ca > > ============================================================= > == Regina's only community-owned and community-run network == > =============================================================
next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects