next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects
conservation, are stressing birds through capture, tag
This is a multipart message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_001C_01D5E248.70962B30
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Yes, I would see a new protocol with human listeners using recording =
devices as a tool to enhance their surveys.
=20
From: naturens-owner@chebucto.ns.ca On Behalf Of Randy Lauff
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2020 15:50
To: NatureNS <naturens@chebucto.ns.ca>
Subject: Re: [NatureNS] Great Horned Owl
=20
I could see Audiomoths being used concurrently with the Nocturnal Owl =
Survey for a few years, just to correlate the two protocols, then =
converting over entirely to the Audiomoth protocol.
=20
Randy
_________________________________
RF Lauff
Way in the boonies of
Antigonish County, NS.
=20
=20
On Wed, 12 Feb 2020 at 14:37, John Kearney <j.f.kearney@gmail.com =
<mailto:j.f.kearney@gmail.com> > wrote:
Hi Bev, Nancy, Randy and all,
I would be most happy to share my knowledge about using AudioMoths; =
set-up, deployment in the field, and programs for listening to and =
annotating recordings. An essential component of the Listening Together =
project is to reach out to community organizations such as yours so I =
would be glad to come and meet with your group to discuss how =
bioacoustics might be useful to the group now and in the future. The =
Listening Together project area includes most of the Valley and the =
South Shore up to about Bridgewater.
There are many views about the use of playback during the breeding =
season (and during migration as well). It is strictly prohibited, =
including pishing, in the North American Breeding Bird Survey, while it =
is an integral component of other survey methods such as nocturnal owl =
monitoring routes. My purpose is to offer another alternative, one that, =
in the long-term, will provide more in-depth and reliable results. We =
haven't yet developed a survey protocol for owls using AudioMoths, but =
it would be fun to work on one.=20
John
-----Original Message-----
From: naturens-owner@chebucto.ns.ca =
<mailto:naturens-owner@chebucto.ns.ca> On Behalf Of Bev Wigney
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2020 10:08
To: naturens@chebucto.ns.ca <mailto:naturens@chebucto.ns.ca>=20
Subject: Re: [NatureNS] Great Horned Owl
Hi John,
That sounds like an interesting project. I just bought an AudioMoth =
unit to try out and was thinking of buying a couple more. I bought this =
one to put in forests to determine which birds are nesting in an area. =
I'll be interested in hearing more about how you will be putting your =
units to work.
Agree -- I think community listening projects could be quite useful.
Our local facebook group has a few hundred members in the Annapolis =
Royal area and many are very interested in nature. I'm quite sure we =
could get something going for listening for owls as many people are =
already doing so at their farms and rural residences.
I look forward to hearing more about how you'll be putting the AudioMoth =
units to use in your area.
Bev
On 2/12/20, John Kearney <j.f.kearney@gmail.com =
<mailto:j.f.kearney@gmail.com> > wrote:
> Hi Donna and all,
>
> This kind of census has a great appeal to me. I don't participate in=20
> the nocturnal owl studies sponsored by Birds Canada since I don't=20
> agree with disturbing and agitating breeding birds that may result=20
> from the requirement to broadcast recordings of owl calls. So many=20
> studies of birds, in the name of conservation, are stressing birds=20
> through capture, tagging, and playback.
> Studies are beginning to show that stress during the breeding season=20
> from human-generated sources can affect not only breeding success but=20
> long-term physiological health.
>
> A new project, called Listening Together, in Southwest Nova Scotia, is =
> developing a survey method that people could use to replace the Birds=20
> Canada survey method. This method involves the placement of=20
> inexpensive but programmable recording devices along an owl survey=20
> route. This method enables the survey participant to listen on a more=20
> frequent basis for the presence of owls on the route without=20
> disturbing the owls. The project is also working on methods to detect=20
> the presence of owl calls in the recording automatically and even=20
> identify the species. These more advanced features will take more time =
> to develop but I'm hoping to have automatic identifiers for a few=20
> species-at-risk, Canada Warbler, Olive-sided Flycatcher, and Rusty=20
> Blackbird, in the next few months. These identifiers will be useful=20
> for confirming the breeding presence of these species-at-risk in=20
> woodlands. I hope to have recording devices, called AudioMoths,=20
> available to borrow by conservation groups by early April.=20
> Unfortunately, the coronavirus may delay the arrival of my order since =
> China produces the circuit boards. Listening Together is funded by=20
> Environment and Climate Change Canada, Nova Scotia Lands and Forestry, =
> and a group of university and NGO partners in Southwest Nova Scotia.=20
> Please contact me if you would like to know more about it.
>
> John
>
> j.f.kearney@gmail.com <mailto:j.f.kearney@gmail.com>=20
>
>
>
> From: naturens-owner@chebucto.ns.ca =
<mailto:naturens-owner@chebucto.ns.ca> On Behalf Of Donna Crossland
> Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2020 20:58
> To: naturens@chebucto.ns.ca <mailto:naturens@chebucto.ns.ca>=20
> Subject: Re: [NatureNS] Great Horned Owl
>
>
>
> It would be fun to form some sort of auditory census for Great-horned=20
> owl nesting pairs right about now. It's interesting to learn of just=20
> where they are nesting and whether they are increasing/decreasing. =20
> The nocturnal owl survey takes care of this to some extent, but it=20
> would be interesting to learn more of their whereabouts, particularly=20
> close to towns, etc.
>
>
>
> Here's hoping that this 2nd apparently 'open winter' (I know that=20
> March can still surprise us) does not negatively affect Barred owl =
populations.
> Bernard Forsythe's report of last year's uncommonly low (nonexist