[NatureNS] Clearcuts

Received-SPF: pass (kirk.authcom.com: authenticated connection) receiver=kirk.authcom.com; client-ip=45.2.193.48; helo=[192.168.0.103]; envelope-from=dwebster@glinx.com; x-software=spfmilter 2.001 http://www.acme.com/software/spfmilter/ with libspf2-1.2.10;
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=glinx.com;
To: Naturens <naturens@chebucto.ns.ca>
From: David Webster <dwebster@glinx.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 14:14:07 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
Precedence: bulk
Return-Path: <naturens-mml-owner@chebucto.ns.ca>
Original-Recipient: rfc822;"| (cd /csuite/info/Environment/FNSN/MList; /csuite/lib/arch2html)"

next message in archive
no next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects

Index of Subjects
Dear All,

     Based on something I saw on Facebook Nov. 21 I gather that logging 
rights, for a given block of crown woodland, are awarded for the 
immediate cut only as opposed to perpetual rights which can be kept or 
sold. Can anyone confirm that this is correct ?

     If this is indeed the case then the current orgy, of logging as if 
there were no future, is understandable. Because for the company in 
question there is no future on that block of woodland.

     In much wild woodland an investment of cash for e.g. culling trash 
trees or non commercial thinning and time must be made before selective 
cutting can become profitable. Unless a company has perpetual access to 
a tract of woodland such investment of money and time would be foolish.

Yt, DW, Kentville

next message in archive
no next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects