next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects
ICBpcyBub3QgYXMgYmFkIGFzIEkgdGhvdWdodC4gV2Ugd2lsbCBzZWUgaWYgbmV4dCBzZW This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------3A3C9CE5474E94867069FDA0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Fritz and all, Plexiglass can readily be shaped by heating it in a kitchen oven. Not having done this for 50 years I am not sure of temperature but I would start at 130 F and increase if necessary. If left in long enough the sharp edges are nicely rounded also. For a 1.5" hole wide and less than 1.5" high, drill a 1.5"hole and then heat in oven over a 2" long wooden anvil with rounded ends. Use a jig to bend after removal from oven. DW, Kantville On 10/29/2019 10:48 AM, Fritz McEvoy wrote: > Hi Parker and All, > I've read online about using an ovoid opening like you describe > and it would likely work. I rejected it here because it's a lot more > work to make ovoid holes in metal or plexi. You would have to make a > template and rout out the holes - rather than just drilling them out. > I assumed that because the commercial predator guards used 1-1/2" > round openings that that was the way to go but obviously they, just > did as I did, and assumed the problem was the nest box material (wood) > and not the hole size. I've also seen box designs using a 1-3/8" round > hole and that probably work as well. This years experiment really only > tells me that squirrels would prefer to squeeze through an 1-1/2" hole > than chew 1/4" Plexiglas and Tree Swallows have no problem with a > plexi predator guard.. As I said in my original email, someone needs > to do the research and publish the results. All the best. > Fritz > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *From:* Fritz McEvoy <fritzmcevoy@hotmail.com> > *Sent:* October 29, 2019 10:01 AM > *To:* Randy Lauff <randy.lauff@gmail.com>; NatureNS > <naturens@chebucto.ns.ca> > *Subject:* Re: [NatureNS] Tree Swallow box report 2019 > HI Randy, > Maybe you should consider banding Tree Swallows instead of > Saw-whet and Boreal Owls. It certainly would be easier than checking > owl boxes.🙂 All the best. > Fritz > > > ________________________________________ > From: naturens-owner@chebucto.ns.ca <naturens-owner@chebucto.ns.ca> on > behalf of Randy Lauff <randy.lauff@gmail.com> > Sent: October 29, 2019 7:59 AM > To: NatureNS > Subject: Re: [NatureNS] Tree Swallow box report 2019 > > Great work, Fritz. > > I installed 8 nest boxes down the road at a horse farm; I had two > swallow nests and one chickadee nest. I'm happy with that, and will > continue monitoring. I wish I had the skill to look at the genetics of > the birds...it would be nice to know if the new nests are the same > birds, their descendants, or new birds (or likely, some sort of mix). > > Randy > _________________________________ > RF Lauff > Way in the boonies of > Antigonish County, NS. > > > On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 at 04:32, Parker Donham > <parker@donham.ca<mailto:parker@donham.ca>> wrote: > Hi Fritz, > > In the past, I've had good luck with an ovoid opening on swallow > boxes, slightly more than 1-1/2" wide and less than 1-1/2" high. > Swallows with their small heads and broad shoulders can squeeze > through this, while squirrels cannot. This usually worked to keep > squirrels out. On occasion, squirrels did chew a wider opening, so > what might be ideal is some sort of sheet metal guard with a hole > 1-3/4" wide and 1-1/4" high. > > Great that you hosted so many. Tree swallows seem to be disappearing > as former hay fields and meadows grow up in brush. > > Parker > > On Mon., Oct. 28, 2019, 10:42 p.m. Fritz McEvoy, > <fritzmcevoy@hotmail.com<mailto:fritzmcevoy@hotmail.com>> wrote: > > > Hi All, > I cleaned out my Tree Swallow boxes last week and the results > were surprising good. Twenty-seven boxes were set up this season and > most had activity of some kind. The results were: > 27 boxes were used (1 is listed twice as it contained both a Red > Squirrel and Tree Swallow next). > 18 boxes contained Tree Swallow nests with signs of breeding (all > had droppings, 2 contained egg fragments and 1 had a dead fledge). > This was the largest number of successful nests I've ever had here. > 5 boxes had Flying Squirrel roosts/nests and one of those had an > active Flying Squirrel inside. > 2 boxes had Red Squirrel roosts (one was on top of a Tree Swallow nest) > 3 boxes were empty > All the boxes had predator guards (3" plexi squares with an > 1-1/2" entrance hole). Obviously these were somewhat unsuccessful in > keeping out squirrels - the only pest I am concerned about. The > predator guards were undamaged so the 1-1/2" hole size must be too > big. I expect they keep out pregnant Red Squirrels but allow in small > Red Squirrels and most Flying Squirrels. An 1-1/2" is the standard > size given for Tree Swallow boxes - and for similar commercial > predator guards. I'm pretty sure remaking the guards with an 1-3/8" > hole would keep out most - if not all squirrels. The problem is would > it also likely keep out pregnant Tree Swallows? It's probably > something that should be researched, tested and written up about out > by someone - just not me. > The weather was similar to 2018 - cold and wet in June but > mostly hot in July. I didn't notice a large number of swallows in the > area this summer. In fact the numbers seemed low to me. So it was > quite surprising when 2/3 of the boxes had Tree Swallow nests with > breeding evidence. Maybe the Tree Swallow decline in this area is not > as bad as I thought. We will see if next season proves just as > successful as this year. > All the best. > Fritz McEvoy > Sunrise Valley (near Dingwall) CB --------------3A3C9CE5474E94867069FDA0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit <html> <head> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"> </head> <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF"> <p>Hi Fritz and all,</p> <p> Pl