[NatureNS] Cornell Article

To: naturens@chebucto.ns.ca
References: <71ca145d-2145-1d41-59ad-e3f29b221ac6@bellaliant.net>
From: Donna Crossland <dcrossland@eastlink.ca>
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2019 19:24:43 -0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
Precedence: bulk
Return-Path: <naturens-mml-owner@chebucto.ns.ca>
Original-Recipient: rfc822;"| (cd /csuite/info/Environment/FNSN/MList; /csuite/lib/arch2html)"

next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects

Index of Subjects
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------F80999BF10DE82E69CFCE26F
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Regarding the article below, I would caution that this story was 
centered on western Montana and, while it is a good article about 
western forests, the take-home messages cannot be directly applied to 
Nova Scotia forests (not that anyone one has said this in the email 
commentary, but in case anyone is thinking it, I cannot resist raising a 
red flag).  Rocky Mountain ecosystems, for the most part, require a 
short fire cycle, with forest ecosystem health relying on fire as a key 
renewal agent.  Eastern forest ecosystems are not reliant on fire as an 
agent of forest renewal. Natural fires in the Acadian forest occur at 
very long intervals, 100s to more than 1000 years between catastrophic 
wildfire events.  It seems that some of our forests may have never 
burned at all, in fact.  The natural cycle of fire varies across Nova 
Scotia depending on the ecoregion, weather patterns, geology, soil 
moisture, elevation, natural fire barriers, etc.  More commonly, Acadian 
forests are renewed through insects, wind events, disease pathogens, and 
senescence/decay, causing gaps of varying sizes and intervals.  Large 
stand-replacement events were rare.  Hence old growth was common.  The 
scientific literature backs this up.  Even the early shipping and mill 
records support that we featured large dimension timber, much of it old 
growth and late successional. Those were the days.

Unfortunately, the frequent land clearance and logging slash fires 
during European settlement changed much of our forest character, right 
down to the soils in many cases.  Presently we have new forest 
disturbance agents called feller bunchers and processors becoming the 
dominant over-riding signal on the forest landscape to the point that 
mature to old forests are becoming hard to find and are very 
fragmented.  In Annapolis County, few natural patches of forest remain. 
   Some levels of government continue to focus on disturbance regimes, 
but for the wrong reasons.  Encouraging us to become concerned about 
getting enough disturbance from fire and other agents into our forest 
systems, rather than concentrating on a greatly-needed long period of 
recovery and restoration.  Most of our forests presently require 
centuries of recovery just to nurse depleted soils back to health from 
fires, acid rain, and clearcutting.  One thing each of us can do is 
encourage hardwood growth, with deep rooting structures that help 
improve soil conditions.

Nonetheless, there are some 'experts' within the Maritimes who will 
continue to proclaim that our NS forests are fire dependent ecosystems, 
failing to recognize the unique disturbance dynamic and complexity of 
Acadian forest.  It is easy to confuse the heightened fire frequencies 
during the 1780s-/ca./1900 as being 'natural' when they were ignited by 
our forefathers for one reason or another.  It's rare that a dry 
lightening strike actually ignites a wildfire of any consequence in NS, 
though it can happen in rare instances, particularly in droughts.  In 
the Rockies it is common and western and northern ecosystems are adapted 
to that.

My 'fire 'n brimstone' sermon for this evening, haha.  (I've researched 
fire history in NB and to a lesser extent in NS, and am aware of some of 
the misinterpretations used by forest industry to justify clearcutting, 
stating that it emulates fire.  There is a lot that is plain wrong with 
this thinking.  And so, I take opportunity to write about fire as it 
relates to the Acadian forest whenever I can.)

Donna Crossland

Tupperville

On 2019-08-08 8:24 a.m., Richard Stern wrote:
> Great article!
>
> Richard Stern
> sent from my Android device
>
> On Thu., Aug. 8, 2019, 7:58 a.m. Don MacNeill, 
> <donmacneill@bellaliant.net <mailto:donmacneill@bellaliant.net>> wrote:
>
>     An interesting take on the ecological value of forest fires
>
>     https://www.allaboutbirds.org/old-flames-the-tangled-history-of-forest-fires-wildlife-and-people/?utm_source=Cornell%20Lab%20eNews&utm_source=Cornell%20Lab%20eNews&utm_campaign=3243b2af77-Living_Bird_Summer_2019_TOC&utm_campaign=e646205961-Cornell-Lab-eNews-2019-08-07&utm_medium=email&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_47588b5758-3243b2af77-&utm_term=0_47588b5758-e646205961-307532077
>
>     -- 
>     Don MacNeill donmacneill@bellaliant.net
>     <mailto:donmacneill@bellaliant.net>
>


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

--------------F80999BF10DE82E69CFCE26F
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <p>Regarding the article below, I would caution that this story was
      centered on western Montana and, while it is a good article about
      western forests, the take-home messages cannot be directly applied
      to Nova Scotia forests (not that anyone one has said this in the
      email commentary, but in case anyone is thinking it, I cannot
      resist raising a red flag).  Rocky Mountain ecosystems, for the
      most part, require a short fire cycle, with forest ecosystem
      health relying on fire as a key renewal agent.  Eastern forest
      ecosystems are not reliant on fire as an agent of forest renewal. 
      Natural fires in the Acadian forest occur at very long intervals,
      100s to more than 1000 years between catastrophic wildfire
      events.  It seems that some of our forests may have never burned
      at all, in fact.  The natural cycle of fire varies across Nova
      Scotia depending on the ecoregion, weather patterns, geology, soil
      moisture, elevation, natural fire barriers, etc.  More commonly,
      Acadian forests are renewed through insects, wind events, disease
      pathogens, and senescence/decay, causing gaps of varying sizes and
      intervals.  Large stand-replacement events were rare.  Hence old
      growth was common.  The scientific literature backs this up.  Even
      the early shipping and mill records support that we featured large
      dimension timber, much of it old growth and late successional. 
      Those were the days.  <br>
    </p>
    <p>Unfortunately, the frequent land clearance and logging slash
      fires during European settlement changed much of our forest
      character, right down to the soils in many cases.  Presently we
      have new forest disturbance agents called feller bunchers and
      processors becoming the dominant over-riding signal on the forest
      landscape to the point that mature to old forests are becoming
      har