[NatureNS] Does anyone know why a broad swath has been cleared on

Received-SPF: pass (kirk.authcom.com: authenticated connection) receiver=kirk.authcom.com; client-ip=45.2.192.180; helo=[192.168.0.101]; envelope-from=dwebster@glinx.com; x-software=spfmilter 2.001 http://www.acme.com/software/spfmilter/ with libspf2-1.2.10;
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=glinx.com;
To: naturens@chebucto.ns.ca
References: <1F3E94A1-0CC1-4438-9535-2347719BC855@bellaliant.net>
From: David Webster <dwebster@glinx.com>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 09:23:37 -0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
Precedence: bulk
Return-Path: <naturens-mml-owner@chebucto.ns.ca>
Original-Recipient: rfc822;"| (cd /csuite/info/Environment/FNSN/MList; /csuite/lib/arch2html)"

next message in archive
no next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects

Index of Subjects
Hi All,

     Good point Fred. But the answer may be fuzzy. It has the 
fingerprints of an upcoming election and a make work project.

Dave

On 5/16/2019 8:58 AM, Frederick W. Schueler wrote:
> * isn't it possible to ask the highway authorities why this was done? 
> Or to ask a newspaper reporter to find out and write an article about it?
>
> fred.
> ========================================================
>
> On 16-May-19 7:42 a.m., Anne Woolaver wrote:
>
>> I wonder if it's a proactive attempt to reduce risk of fires later in 
>> the summer (many apparent examples on Google of fires being started 
>> from cigarette butts thrown from vehicles), although that wouldn't 
>> explain why they've only done the 101. - A. Woolaver
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> *From:* naturens-owner@chebucto.ns.ca <naturens-owner@chebucto.ns.ca> 
>> on behalf of Patrick Kelly <Patrick.Kelly@Dal.Ca>
>> *Sent:* May 15, 2019 10:37 PM
>> *To:* <naturens@chebucto.ns.ca>
>> *Subject:* Re: [NatureNS] Does anyone know why a broad swath has been 
>> cleared on both sides of highway 101?
>> Hi all:
>>
>> Finally back in the province. As someone who taken the 101 on a 
>> regular basis, I can safely say that at least 75% of the clearance 
>> has nothing to do with the "saftety manual". They have cut across the 
>> top of extended cliffes 3-4 metres high, beyond guard-rails where the 
>> ground slopes away steeply (no being slowed down by young birch, you 
>> will now fall unobstructed). In one place, they have removed the 
>> finger-width birch so if you got off the road at a 30‚ angile it will 
>> be straight into a flat rock face with nothing to slow you down..... 
>> a total waste of money for most of it. -  Pat
>>
>>
>> On May 11, 2019, at 11:17 AM, David Hughes wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks for the link Phil. That does seem to explain what is going 
>>> on. We have noticed similar clearing around some of the on and off 
>>> ramps around HRM and the improved visibility is beneficial in some 
>>> places. In other places, it is hard to fathom what the actual 
>>> benefit might be beyond aligning with written standards. However, I 
>>> believe following standards is important and deviating from them 
>>> shouldn’t be at the discretion of the people doing the work.
>>>
>>> Given the sorry state of our highways, I do wonder about the budget 
>>> priorities.
>>>
>>> As for using Google, I do know how to use it and I think most other 
>>> NatureNS also know how. However, I enjoy hearing the different 
>>> perspectives offered by members of this group. That is why I asked 
>>> NatureNS and not Google. - David
>>>
>>>> On May 11, 2019, at 7:05 AM, Phil Schappert <philjs@eastlink.ca 
>>>> <mailto:philjs@eastlink.ca>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Doesn't anyone know how to Google anymore? A simple "cutting trees 
>>>> shrubs along highways" search turned up:
>>>>
>>>> https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/local_rural/training/fhwasa07018/
>>>>
>>>> This is an US Federal Highways Administration book about roadside 
>>>> clearing...I'm sure the same applies here both federally and 
>>>> provincially. - Phil
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>          Frederick W. Schueler & Aleta Karstad
>          Fragile Inheritance Natural History
> Mudpuppy Night in Oxford Mills - https://www.facebook.com/MudpuppyNight/
> 'Daily' Paintings - http://karstaddailypaintings.blogspot.com/
> 4 St-Lawrence Street Bishops Mills, RR#2 Oxford Station, Ontario K0G 1T0
>   on the Smiths Falls Limestone Plain  44.87156° N 75.70095° W
> (613)258-3107 <bckcdb at istar.ca> http://pinicola.ca/
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> "Feasting on Conolophus to the conclusion of consanguinity"
>  - 
> http://www.lulu.com/shop/frederick-w-schueler/feasting-on-conolophus-to-the-conclusion-of-consanguinity-a-collection-of-darwinian-verses/paperback/product-23517445.html
> ------------------------------------------------------------

next message in archive
no next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects