next message in archive
no next message in thread
previous message in archive
Index of Subjects
--001a113fc45a4c9cc30566b394cf Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In case some of you did not see this article in the *Chronicle Herald* last week, Feb. 27, "Rural N.S. needs ethical, ecologically literate economics by ROBERT CERVELLI KAREN FOSTER and GREGORY HEMING, you can read it here: http://thechronicleherald.ca/nowns/conversations/1548942-opinion-rural-n.s.= -needs-ethical-ecologically-literate-economics It starts out referencing the Feb. 3 column by Bill Black, asking *How can rural N.S. prosper without resource extraction <http://thechronicleherald.ca/opinion/1542500-black-how-can-rural-n.s.-pros= per-without-resource-extraction>* *?,* <http://thechronicleherald.ca/opinion/1542500-black-how-can-rural-n.s.-pros= per-without-resource-extraction>* Bill Black invited <http://thechronicleherald.ca/opinion/1542500-black-how-can-rural-n.s.-pros= per-without-resource-extraction>* =E2=80=9Cthose who want strong rural communities, but want to abolish all m= ining and quarrying, marine-based salmon farms, oil and gas development, and paper mills . . . to explain how they imagine those communities can keep their young people and thrive.=E2=80=9D The Centre for Local Prosperity released a report in Shelburne - here is an exerpt from the article: "Over the last three years, the Centre for Local Prosperity has engaged rural residents in conversations on local economics and ecological health. Our study, Import Replacement: Local Prosperity for Rural Atlantic Canada, was released in a town hall meeting in Shelburne on Feb. 26. It demonstrates that by targeting even a 10-per-cent increase in local production of currently-imported goods and services across the region, we could add more than 43,000 new good jobs, $2.6 billion in new wages, and $219 million in new tax revenue, without running roughshod over the economic and social possibilities for the next generation." Interesting stuff! Nancy Robinson --001a113fc45a4c9cc30566b394cf Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div dir=3D"ltr"><div>In case some of you did not see this article in the <= i>Chronicle Herald</i> last week, Feb. 27,<font size=3D"4"><span style=3D"f= ont-weight:normal"> "Rural N.S. needs ethical, ecologically literate e= conomics by </span></font><span class=3D"gmail-author">ROBERT CERVELLI KARE= N FOSTER and GREGORY HEMING,=C2=A0 </span>you can read it here:<br><br><a h= ref=3D"http://thechronicleherald.ca/nowns/conversations/1548942-opinion-rur= al-n.s.-needs-ethical-ecologically-literate-economics">http://thechronicleh= erald.ca/nowns/conversations/1548942-opinion-rural-n.s.-needs-ethical-ecolo= gically-literate-economics</a><br><br></div><div>It starts out referencing = the Feb. 3 column by Bill Black, asking=C2=A0 <u><strong><a href=3D"http://= thechronicleherald.ca/opinion/1542500-black-how-can-rural-n.s.-prosper-with= out-resource-extraction">How can rural N.S. prosper without resource extrac= tion</a></strong></u><a href=3D"http://thechronicleherald.ca/opinion/154250= 0-black-how-can-rural-n.s.-prosper-without-resource-extraction"><u><strong>= ?,</strong></u></a><u><strong><a href=3D"http://thechronicleherald.ca/opini= on/1542500-black-how-can-rural-n.s.-prosper-without-resource-extraction"> B= ill Black invited</a></strong></u> =E2=80=9Cthose who want strong rural communities, but want to abolish all= =20 mining and quarrying, marine-based salmon farms, oil and gas=20 development, and paper mills . . . to explain how they imagine those=20 communities can keep their young people and thrive.=E2=80=9D<br></div><div>= <br></div>The Centre for Local Prosperity released a report in Shelburne - = here is an exerpt from the article: <br><br>"Over the last three years= , the Centre for Local Prosperity has engaged=20 rural residents in conversations on local economics and ecological=20 health. Our study, Import Replacement: Local Prosperity for Rural=20 Atlantic Canada, was released in a town hall meeting in Shelburne on=20 Feb. 26. It demonstrates that by targeting even a 10-per-cent increase=20 in local production of currently-imported goods and services across the=20 region, we could add more than 43,000 new good jobs, $2.6 billion in new wages, and $219 million in new tax revenue, without running roughshod=20 over the economic and social possibilities for the next generation."<b= r clear=3D"all"><div><div><div><br></div><div>Interesting stuff! <br>=C2=A0= <br></div><div><div class=3D"gmail_signature"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div><div di= r=3D"ltr"><div><div dir=3D"ltr"><div><div dir=3D"ltr"><div><div dir=3D"ltr"= ><div><div>Nancy Robinson<br></div></div><br></div><div><br></div></div></d= iv></div></div></div></div></div></div></div> </div></div></div></div> --001a113fc45a4c9cc30566b394cf--
next message in archive
no next message in thread
previous message in archive
Index of Subjects